"Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> Also are we only supporting xalan for xslt processing ?
junit xsls are a bit different, it is not related to the the style/xslt task
here.
They require xalan since day 1 because of multiple output (use of the
'redir
"Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 5 Feb 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Use xalan extensions to replace strings and avoid a stack overflow
> > when doing deep recursions.
>
> will this break for Xalan-J 1.x?
That's a very good question th