Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be added after 1.7.0 is released? shouldn't we wait for that? Martijn On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello, I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be prese

Re: vmwatcher junit patch

Here is the patch (currently not in the state that i could apply it..) On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have prepared a patch for the vmwatcher file missing, will apply it after 1.7.0 is released. Hi Martijn, what does it consist of? The times that I have s

vmwatcher junit patch

Hi, I have prepared a patch for the vmwatcher file missing, will apply it after 1.7.0 is released. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly wrote: My comment was on the define feature in it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It was placed there as an experiment, but I do not think that people have used it (as there is no comments, and it does not fullfill its usecase - it leaves removable

Re: svn commit: r486141 - /ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/condition/hasfreespace-test.xml

Hi Could those tests be please be written in such way that these will not fail / error under jdk 1.5 or lower? And do you feel 100% comfortable in adding this while working on the release candidates? Br Martijn Author: kevj Date: Tue Dec 12 05:53:13 2006 New Revision: 486141 URL: http:/

Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?

I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and the final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing non-essential things between the RCs). Martijn Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Regards, Antoine Original

Re: AW: svn commit: r486146 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/StringUtils.java

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesnt work on my JDK-1.2.1_004 Hi Jan, were you able to run the official 1.7.0 RC with JDK-1.2.1? Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [RE-VOTE] AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, I've re-built AntUnit with -source 1.2 and uploaded everything to . I'd like to release those files as 1.0Beta2. Sorry, do not have the time to look at this at the moment, don't wait for me so: +0 Martijn ---

Re: [patch] NioFileUtils, Java6FileUtils, FileUtilsAdapter + factory, build.xml (was Re: AW: Adding a methof to StringUtils)

Ist es nicht schrecklich, dass der menschlichen Klugheit so enge Grenzen gesetzt sind und der menschlichen Dummheit überhaupt keine? (Konrad Adenauer) Isn't it terrible that so close borders are set to the human intelligence and the human stupidity at all none? This is a nice quote (tot

Re: Marking deprecated with since tags

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Kev Jackson wrote: * @deprecated since 1.4.x Use getGlobalFilterSet().addFilter(token,value) Is this seen as useful. And how do you look at the proposal to drop the deprecated since 1.4.x in 1.7? +1 There's a fair bit of old code that has been deprecated for a whi

Re: [patch] NioFileUtils, Java6FileUtils, FileUtilsAdapter + factory, build.xml (was Re: AW: Adding a methof to StringUtils)

Ist es nicht schrecklich, dass der menschlichen Klugheit so enge Grenzen gesetzt sind und der menschlichen Dummheit überhaupt keine? (Konrad Adenauer) Isn't it terrible that so close borders are set to the human intelligence and the human stupidity at all none? On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Kev Jacks

Re: [VOTE] removal of the test task based upon the org.apache.testlet framework

+1 Martijn On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello, Do you want to remove from ant the usage of the org.apache.testlet framework : see this document : [1] describing the optional task. [ ] Yes [ ] No I consider this a code change, requiring lazy approval and then lazy consen

Re: [VOTE] removal of Visual for Java based tasks

+1, Martijn On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello, Do you want to remove from ant the usage of Visual Age for Java : see this document : [1] I believe that IBM has replaced Visual Age for Java with WSAD since a long time. Stefan Bodewig also wrote that the Visual Age Tasks i

Re: [VOTE] removal of icontract based task in ant

+1 Martijn On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello, Do you want to remove from ant the usage of icontract : see the documentation of the optional task icontract [1]. The link [2] contained in the page [3] listing the library dependencies of ant is dead. [ ] Yes [ ] No I con

Re: [VOTE] Shut down the 1.6 branch after 1.6.5

+1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.5 release

+1 Martijn Hello, I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd. This will be a pure bug fix release. [] Yes [] No Let's begin with my +1 Cheers, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate

Should we wait a few more days? Maybe yes. I do have a few bug assigned to me that I want to fix, basically javadoc and cvstagdiff. The later will involve adding a new class and has the potential to cause trouble, so I'd feel more comfortable if we waited two more days (either I get things done un

Re: When to move Ant to SVN?

If we do keep CVS open for 1.6 maintenance it will mean merging changes between svn (1.7) and cvs (1.6). That will be difficult, IMHO. I don't think we want to straddle CVS and SVN. Just a single jump across before the release will be cleaner. Would this really be a problem if we would only fi

Re: [VOTE] Start a subproject for Ant libraries

+1 I'd rather have only one version control system though, (and a version control system that is supported by a non sandbox part of ant). This is not meant as a no against svn, but more as ant should in that case also be migrated to svn lets say this calender year, and the svn tasks should be m