execution).
URL protocol handlers are simple standard structures and support within Ant
for these structures would have a significant positive impact on the forward
development of Depot.
I have to look into Depot. Like I said, I think I'll step asi
t to the reader of a build script, rather than
obscuring a thing's actual location inside of a protocol handler
black's box.
> The key thing is that these protocols enable the removal of
> location concerns by shifting the focus to identity.
Just some thoughts on this interestin
There you go! I was beginning to think the listeners would register
with their log level as an added parameter, but this makes more sense.
Scott S.
Framingham, MA
On 9/25/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if there's a useful answer to be found.
Note unless we add
Ah, that adds some helpful context.
How come the runtime doesn't know the current log level?
Scott Stirling
Framingham, MA
On 9/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because the runtime does not know the current loglevel.
The RT forwards the (build) message to the
to log the same damn thing so you wind up with massive stack
traces logged multiple times by well-meaning components that should
often just be throwing their exceptions up to a higher layer for
logging and other handling.
Scott Stirling
Framingham, MA
On 9/25/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
should
often just be throwing their exceptions up to a higher layer for
logging and other handling.
Scott Stirling
Framingham, MA
On 9/25/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Remember early this year I had a problem with a build that basically
ran out of memory and if I comment
Yes, exactly. Sorry, I missed that. Just re-joined the list after a
long absence. I've implemented "pseudo" or application-level protocol
handlers before to achieve the same goals as here (as I understand
them so far).
Scott S.
Scott, are you talking about something like option (b)
that I descr
user perspective? In build
scripts? If that's the case, then I'd definitely say consider letting
Ant handle them and convert them to standard URLs through a registry
mechanism perhaps like the custom task registry.
> I guess my position on these ha
