Steve Loughran wrote:
Rob Oxspring wrote:
Hi,
I've been having problems with the signjar task occasionally failing
with "exec returned: 128" for a long time now. The problem isn't
always reproducible and often disappears by simply cleaning the build
area and starting a
Hi,
I've been having problems with the signjar task occasionally failing
with "exec returned: 128" for a long time now. The problem isn't always
reproducible and often disappears by simply cleaning the build area and
starting again; sometimes this technique doesn't work though.
I checked th
I haven't used it yet but have you seen: http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
It might be an easier route to svn support!
Sorry if that pours water on your fire :(
Rob
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
is more-or-less done.
While I worked on the task I realized how limited the original cvs
task actually is,
Hi Steve,
I'm sure I remember talk of remote junit tests on ant-dev a while back
(a year??), couldn't find references recently though... was it you that
was interested then? Anyone else? - would have thought others were
interested at least! Anyway comments / questions inline:
Steve Loughran wr
IIRC Conor originally created the depend task.
Rob
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yep. Let's just do it. I'm the original offender.
Original offender?
-Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Here we go then: the patch simply logs at DEBUG level rather than INFO
if nothing has been acheived.
Thanks,
Rob
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Rob Oxspring wrote:
One of my (very few) pet hates with ant is that the depends task
displays something when it performs a no-op. This seems counter to
One of my (very few) pet hates with ant is that the depends task
displays something when it performs a no-op. This seems counter to
other tasks (copy, javac, zip IIRC) and means that my complex build ends
up spitting out a lot of output while doing very little. The output
itself doesn't exact
zilla report with your patch ?
> I could not read you attachment anyway.
> Also include in your patch the docu if possible.
> Thanks in advance.
> Antoine
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
First up, sorry for no unit tests - just doing enough to get by for now :)
Anyway, I was using the image task to create thumbnails and couldn't figure out
how to keep proportions of an image but keep it within a fixed size. My
solution was to change the keepproportions attribute to be a little
