> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2003 19:46
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Aston
> Sent: 28 September 2003 15:49
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> Patch and new file attached f
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2003 18:23
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Aston
> Sent: 25 September 2003 22:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
[Initially sent to user@ant.apache.org, resent to a more appropriate
place].
Hi,
I finally got fed up with the cost of forking a new process for every test
(~1 second in my environment). I've hacked to support a new type
of where where all of the tests are executed in a single
sub-process. *M
