Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html

2005-05-31 Thread Neeme Praks
just 1-2 retries, there is not much of a loop to talk about. Rgds, Neeme Steve Cohen wrote: I'm not entirely sure what you mean. By "jitter", are you referring to varying the time delay? I asked Neeme Praks why he didn't put in a time delay and he said he didn't need

Re: [patch] FTP.java - adding support for new features in commons-net 1.4.0 and performance improvement

2005-05-11 Thread Neeme Praks
Steve Loughran wrote: I worry about releasing any change to code without giving it time to stabilise and beta test. Last minute "this won't break anything" patches always break something. Always. At least in my experience. If commons1.4.0 is incompatible with shipping then yes, we have no choi

Re: [patch] FTP.java - adding support for new features in commons-net 1.4.0 and performance improvement

2005-05-10 Thread Neeme Praks
Ok, commons-net 1.4.0 has been released now. How can we proceed? Meanwhile I also implemented the feature of retry-on-IOException, for FTP task. Stefan Bodewig wrote: The vote has passed and release is being prepared (see below). Hopefully it will be ready in a day or two. Sounds good.

Re: [patch] FTP.java - adding support for new features in commons-net 1.4.0 and performance improvement

2005-05-09 Thread Neeme Praks
Stefan Bodewig wrote: "upcoming" means, it hasn't been released yet, correct? Is there a release plan for 1.4.0? We can't make a task as much-used as ftp (judging from the number of bug-reports) depend on a CVS snapshot of an external libary - at least no released version of that task. The vote h

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

2003-03-26 Thread Neeme Praks
ok, fair enough. I sent a patch to commons-dev with a workaround for Jelly anyway... just have to check back now if the patch was actually noticed or not ;-) Stefan Bodewig :: On 26 Mar 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm going to throw in the extra check in CVS HEAD later today

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

2003-03-26 Thread Neeme Praks
Stefan Bodewig :: On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support the specified element. This is because storeElement can never be called without calling createElement before that from within Ant. It may be dif

[patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

2003-03-01 Thread Neeme Praks
While tracking down a bug in Jelly Ant tag library[1], I also found a related bug in Ant: (Not sure if this can be called a bug, rather it is an inconsistency) createElement() method throws an BuildException, if the tag does not support the specified element. getElementType() method throws an B