Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.5.3 Release

+1 Check of differences in git between tags rel/2.5.2 and 2.5.3 doap file is missing a tag between versions 2.5.3 and 2.5.2. this should not be blocking in my view as doap seems not to be actually used anywhere anymore. (Maybe remove the file entirely at the next release?) - Martijn Op 25

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC2

+1 Martijn Op 27/08/2024 om 03:42 schreef Jaikiran Pai: +1 -Jaikiran On 25/08/24 8:49 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've created RC2 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2     on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3 tarballs: https://dis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC1

Checked the diff between rel 1.10.14 and 1.10.15 RC 1 in git: It seems the following changes are missing from the release notes / whatsnew: - ReplaceRegExp task has a new failOnError attribute (also it seems Andrew Quan seems to have contributed this change and has not been included in the C

Re: [VOTE] EOL Apache Ant 1.9.x release series

+1 Martijn Op 16/06/2024 om 14:47 schreef Nicolas Lalevée: +1 Nicolas Le 16 juin 2024 à 08:10, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : Hello everyone, 4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions of Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formalize it (whic

Re: [VOTE] Retire the IvyDE Subproject

Op 23/11/2023 om 08:19 schreef Stefan Bodewig: I'm really sorry and embarrassed but I seem to have misunderstood the purpose of the Attic, it is not responsible for retiring subprojects, only for top level projects like Ant as a whole with all subprojects. The correct process to follow is https

Re: [VOTE] Send IvyDE to the Apache Attic

+1 Martijn Op 20/11/2023 om 04:50 schreef Jaikiran Pai: On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: ... So here is the formal vote: I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to the Apache Attic. +1 -Jaikiran -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

+1 checked diff to of indicated commit to rel/1.10.12 Martijn Op 09/01/2023 om 02:30 schreef Jaikiran Pai: +1 Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine -Jaikiran On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Iyv 2.5.1 Based on RC1

+1 Martijn Op 03/11/2022 om 12:56 schreef Jaikiran Pai: +1 - Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.1-bin.tar.gz. - Installed locally. - Ran  java -jar $IVY_HOME/ivy-2.5.1.jar -version (correct version reported) - Then built a few existing projects with this version and they passed - Checked some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.11 based on RC1

Hi I Reviewed the changes. If the https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/UnknownElement.java changes address an Time Of Destruction / Time of Use issue it should work. If "realThing" is created / changed from another threat the changes (or even the initial ob

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.9.15 based on RC1

Reviewed changes +1 br Martijn Kruithof Op 10/07/2021 om 20:13 schreef Stefan Bodewig: Hi all I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16: git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1 on commit: ea698c454 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ revision: 48766 Maven arti

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache AntUnit 1.4.1 based on RC1

Reviewed changes based on tag 1.4.1 RC1 vs tag 1.4 Given the compatibility claims I tried to test against ant-1.8.1 and jdk 1.5 in wich case test cases using URLs are failing. The failing of these test are probably caused by jdk 1.5 not supporting tls 1.2 which is minimally required nowadays.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.9 based on RC1

Performed manual review only +1 But: - Fixed 2 typo's found (committed to master) - should reference to Rhino being available in java 7 runtime be removed from the manual (script.html) and should the system requirements in install be updated to reflect 1.10 series requires jdk 8? (preparing pul

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.7 based on RC1

ant released Please note, commit 80768efaab4003d90252095d160facfc35adc35e and the tag are not visible (yet) Martijn Kruithof On 02-09-19 07:07, Jaikiran Pai wrote: +1. - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary - Installed it and checked the NOTICE file. - Random check of some manuals - Built some

Re: Augmenting the ant wrapper script for OS packaging

+1 On 12-06-19 07:16, Jaikiran Pai wrote: On 11/06/19 9:54 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I'm a bit torn but would prefer adding it to the default script so that running Ant would use the same wrapper no matter how you've installed it. I'm afraid we'd have to ask people "how have you installed Ant"

Re: [VOTE] Jean-Louis Boudart as a PMC member

Conor MacNeill schreef op 26-11-2013 19:47: On 26 November 2013 22:04, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Jean-Louis has been around for a very long time, owned committership, contributed a lot to bring EasyAnt into the Ant PMC, and he is participating to the vote in the release process. Thus, let's inv

Re: [VOTE] Charles Duffy as a committer

+1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

+1 Martijn Op 11-3-2013 15:05, Peter Reilly schreef: +1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: +1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig +1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Lev

Re: [VOTE] Michael Clarke as a committer

[X] +1 to add Michael Clarke as a committer Martijn Kruithof - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.8.4

Op 22-5-2012 9:12, Stefan Bodewig schreef: On 2012-05-22, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I would like to release Ant 1.8.4. Ant 1.8.4 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_184/ +1

Re: [VOTE] Drop JDK 1.4 after 1.8.3

+1 (w move to 1.9) Martijn Op 30-1-2012 11:22, Peter Reilly schreef: + 1 and move to 1.9 Yey, we may even dabble in these new fangled generics Peter On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2012-01-27, Jesse Glick

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor of EasyAnt

+1 Martijn On 4-1-2011 15:59, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I am voting +1 for the proposal and volunteering to be the champion. Regards, Antoine On 1/4/2011 8:53 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Let's start this year with formal vote about Apache Ant being the sponsor for EasyAnt to enter the

Re: AW: Can Anybody Fix our Logos?

On 17-11-2010 18:21, Jan Matèrne wrote: Does anybody have a correct Apache logo (with the "tm")? I haven't found any for using as "inspiration" ... Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bushel Donation

On 5-11-2010 15:45, Stefan Bodewig wrote: So, do we want to accept the Bushel donation? +1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Compress Antlib 1.0

+1 maybe we should add an installation instruction. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] IvyDE 2.1.0 Release

On 2010-08-11, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Do you vote for the release of these binaries? [ ] Yes [ ] No +1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Manuals of Last Five Ant Releases

+1 On 19-7-2010 16:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, I don't really think this requires a vote since I've just repackaged existing distributions (see buildfile at the end of the mail for details), but it won't hurt. In there are ZIP and tar.gz/bz2 files

Re: [VOTE] Remove commercial tasks from Ant

On 19-6-2010 20:38, Bruce Atherton wrote: Ant supplies several tasks that require commercial software in order to run. This is a problem because the Ant developers do not typically have access to the commercial products required to test, maintain, and enhance the tasks. It also means that users

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

On 18-5-2010 4:11, Jesse Glick wrote: Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split into subtrees? [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. [ x ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where e

Re: [VOTE] use nexus for maven upload of ant release

+1 to use nexus to upload ant, antlibs and ivy Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

On 4-5-2010 14:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 [X] Yes [ ] No +1 martijn No problems observed - To unsubscribe

Re: [POLL] Bug 48804

I agree, however it may be good to update the 1.8.0 manual with a warning that the behavior is currently not as intended and will change, published as soon as the solution is changed. br martijn On 23/04/2010 2:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, currently extension-point and import don't

Re: [Vote] Augment feature

Hello I have quite some difficulties with the discrepancy of the name of the task and that what the task is about to do. Therefore, using the current name and functionality I would cast a -0,5 vote, as i do not want to be blocking. I can see the desire for a task that changes predeclared id's.

Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)

On 11-2-2010 17:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes. Count this at least as a +0.5;-) It is not like the current way of publishing would seize to function when we use a s

Re: [VOTE] [second attempt] release of ant 1.8.0

On 2-2-2010 2:12, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue. a candidate for ant 1.8.0 is available under http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0/ Vote [x] Release as Apache Ant 1.8.0 [] Do not release yet +1 Martijn ---

Re: [VOTE] release ant 1.8.0RC1

Hi I am +1 on releasing this build 2 questions though: Is it correct that no pom files are present for ant-apache-xalan2.jar in the lib directory? Is it correct that pom files are present for ant-parent and ant-stylebook although no jar files are present? Br Martijn Jesse Glick wrote: Anto

Re: [VOTE] name for target-group

I would be in favour of using and or even and the dash in the name is not something we usually do in ant Martijn Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hi, I would like to start a formal vote on the name of target-group. [ ] for the group and ... for the members of the group this is the current c

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

Hi a +1 from me Martijn Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows build files to be written in Groovy. It can be found attached to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347 It would start life at Ant inside the sandbox.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

+1 Martijn Bruce Atherton wrote: +1. Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows build files to be written in Groovy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.

Re: [VOTE] New committer - Jon Schneider

Matt Benson wrote: Please vote whether to admit Jon Schneider as an Ant committer for his contributions to Ivy and IvyDE. Voting is open for one week. Remember that although only PMC votes are binding, anyone may give his opinion. [x] +1 Welcome! [ ] -1 I don't want him (because of: ...) [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Promote the Compress Antlib

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, the compress Antlib which provides cpio and ar archiving and unarchiving tasks in addition to alternative tar, zip, bzip2 and gzip tasks is functionally more or less complete and I'd like to release it shortly after 1.8.0 since it addresses a few bugzilla issues for

Re: [VOTE] Promote the props Antlib out of the Sandbox

+1 Martijn --- On Wed, 9/30/09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: From: Stefan Bodewig Subject: [VOTE] Promote the props Antlib out of the Sandbox To: dev@ant.apache.org Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 3:54 AM Hi all, IMHO the new PropertyHelper API can be used to solve quite a few scripty thi

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.1.0-rc2 Release

Have not verified, the actual dowloads, still +1 Martijn - Original Message From: Maarten Coene To: ant-dev Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2009 11:49:17 PM Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.1.0-rc2 Release Hi all, I have built Ivy 2.1.0-rc2. You can download it from this URL: http://people.apache.or

debug when using ant-unit

Hello I am trying to test the adaptet get task using antunit, but I keep getting failures i cannot explain I do run the testcase in a simple build file without using antunit and the log does contain the correct line, when running from antunit the assertLogContains does not match. Is there any

Re: dev-list etiquette questions

Best way to contribute a patch is to create a bug report (in this case bugzilla). The title of the bug report should start with [Patch]. This is currently not documented well. br Martijn > Hi Ant guys, I have a couple of etiquette questions, > > 1/ how do I contribute a patch? (or where can I fi

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

+1 from me too, Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Bug 46326 - StarTeam: Use Cache Agent for Checkouts

Stefan Bodewig schreef: You shouldn't resolve any of these bugs in bugzilla before the patches have actually been applied to Ant's code base - you lose visibility to the committers. I have changed the status accordingly. A Starteam Antlib that could be released separately from Ant would be

Re: help needed with clearantlib

Seems like an maven error on an 3rd party component with instructions to install yet another 3rd party component. Please contact either the maven or the clearantlib user list (that if the error persists after installing checkstyle) br Martijn meher03 schreef: Hi , I am getting the following e

Re: svn commit: r739577 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/property/NullReturn.java

Doubted it, checked it and it returned NullPointerException. D:\>type Test.java public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(String.valueOf(null)); } } D:\>java Test Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at java.lang.String.(Unknown S

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Java 1.4 as a minimum requirement for core/trunk

+1 for 1.8 / main doubting if it is a good idea for 1.7.x if we would make another one. Martijn Stefan Bodewig schreef: This is not that much based on features available (although I consider using NIO in StreamPumper) but more on "where do we test". The vote is simple. If you vote +1 then we

Re: Java version required for trunk

Hello I know i have not been really active for some time now (changed house, then job) yet I manage to remember previous discussions. I still feel that the following reasoning is flawed: There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in trunk. One of the aguments against

Re: [VOTE] 1.7.1 Release now available for final testing

yes [x] (+1) no [ ] I performed some basic checks, here is my +1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache IvyDE 2.0.0.alpha1

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce that I have a version of IvyDE ready to be released. You will find the files in my home directory on people.apache.org /home/hibou/ivyde-release Here is my +0 I have not been

Re: [Vote] 1.7.1beta2

Ok +1 Martijn Kevin Jackson schreef: Hi, I've been informed (on the q.t) that I never actually requested a vote before announcing that the ant 1.7.1 beta tarballs were available. So officially at the moment, the tarballs on people.apache.org that I announced are beta-in-potentia :( A retrosp

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

+1 Martijn Kevin Jackson schreef: Hi all, I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to let them in on a case by case basis Over

Re: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724

Marcelo Tancredi schreef: Hi, I am having the same problem here. What is the fix for this? Thanks - Marcelo Tancredi IBM Software Group - Boca Raton, Florida [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I have added a link to the fixed source in the bugrep in ant 1.7.1 the fix will be included. Further inquirie

Re: 1.7.1 - Beta Vote

+1 on the plan / releasing a beta Martijn Kevin Jackson schreef: Hi, As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late). I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks. The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test completion on the most tro

Re: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer

+1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposed patch for XMLResultAggregator and junit-frames.xsl

Hi could you please file a bugreport as enhancement wich includes your patch. br Martijn s p schreef: Hi, I've just created a patch for the Ant source code repository which will introduce the possibility to link to external log files from generated JUnit test reports. Our tests do not outp

Re: Bug In org.apache.tools.ant.util.FileUtils

Hi this change was intentional, a bugrep was filed that under certain circumstances the generated file name was used before it was created, which could indeed not be ruled out. For situations where only a name is needed the method createTempFileName was introduced. I see your problem and hav

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt)

+1 Martijn -Original Message- From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: jeudi 6 décembre 2007 7:34 To: Ant Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt) I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 You can download it from this URL: http:/

Re: FW: [VOTE] Migrate Ivy SVN

Stefan Bodewig schreef: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This was already discussed, but the conclusion was not clear. Do we migrate https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy I thought this was already dec

Re: Where to place sponsorship link?

Gilles Scokart schreef: Did someone have an idea where to place the link to the sponsorship page? Did we have to place it in ant home page only, or do we have to place it also in ivy home page In ant home page, I think a good place could be: - a separate menu Sponsorship at the end of the projec

Re: terminating running builds better

To Recently I have put some effort to remove ignoring thread.interrupt from all kinds of (endless) loops. Interrupting a few times (as other parts may also wait in order to neatly close resources) should now stop ant. Martijn Darin Swanson schreef: Eclipse is pretty similar to #1. We hav

Re: Ant SVN Trunk - errors in LocatorTest & RmicAdvancedTest

Steve Loughran schreef: Kev Jackson wrote: Hi, After Steve's work yesterday, I was going to pull in the changes to the release to try and get a clean build...but: (these errors occur with the svn trunk code) LocatorTest testNetworkURI Failure Expected file:\\PC03\jclasses\lib\ant-1.7.0.jar

Re: svn commit: r590990 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/WorkerAnt.java

public void waitUntilFinished(long timeout) throws InterruptedException { synchronized(notify) { -if(finished) { -return; +while (!finished) { +notify.wait(timeout); } -notify.wait(timeout); }

Re: Bugs in release branch

Hi Using ant 1.7.1 alpha on jdk 1.6 i have the same junit test failures ( 7 failures and 5 errors) and some antunit testcases fail 1 error, 2 failures (Furthermore it blocks halfway the test until user input is received imo this is annoying for automated testing.) results: http://kruithof.xs4a

Re: [VOTE] Merge Ivy and Ant Dev Lists

Stefan Bodewig schreef: Hi, it seemed as if the discussion favored a joined mailing lists of Anf (and antlibs) and Ivy, so here is the formal vote. Should we merge [EMAIL PROTECTED] into [EMAIL PROTECTED] and likewise [EMAIL PROTECTED] into the new [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefan +1 Martijn ---

Re: [VOTE] Create a Separate Mailing List for Commits/Bugzilla/Gump ...

Stefan Bodewig schreef: Hi, this came up in the thread dealing with mailing list organization now that Ivy is with us, but I guess many people have missed it. Do we want to add a new list [EMAIL PROTECTED] that will receive all Commit, Gump, Bugzilla, Jira and Wiki notification mails (and whate

Re: svn commit: r585108 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/XSLTProcess.java

Kevin Jackson schreef: Tell me how to merge stuff in SVN and I will try! I just copied'n'pasted :( apparently svn 1.5 will have easier merging than currently[1] http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79 I've been playing with git recently and I'm very very impressed by it's performance - c

Re: Infrastructure

Xavier Hanin schreef: On 10/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't want either, but ATM Ivy site is not integrated to incubator site, and Ivy is reachable at incubator.apache.org/ivy/. So why not take the same approach here? We can do that

Re: AW: Ivy mailing list organisation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: maybe we could create the following lists ant-bugs (gump, bugzilla, (what bug platform is ivy on?)) ant-commits (svn commits from both ivy and ant) ant-dev (development discussion on both ivy and ant) ant-user (as-is for the users) ivy-user (as-is for the users)

Re: Ivy mailing list organisation

Xavier Hanin schreef: On 10/12/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: maybe we could create the following lists ant-bugs (gump, bugzilla, (what bug platform is ivy on?)) ant-commits (svn commits from

Re: Ivy mailing list organisation

Stefan Bodewig schreef: On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/11/07, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What about using [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] directly, and discuss Ivy directly on the Ant lists? Ivy could be considered in

Re: svn commit: r581055 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

Please review, I was not able to test it today. (the { in the while clause is on a separate line because it would break the 80 char limit) Martijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: Author: jkf Date: Mon Oct 1 13:07:17 2007 New Revision: 581055 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=581055&view=rev

Re: [VOTE] Accept Ivy as subproject of Ant

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: The Ivy community has voted [1] for becoming a subproject of Ant. Should we accept Ivy as subproject? Which means that we will share the ACL and have similar access rights to subversion. Our initial thought [2] when we starting mentoring Ivy in the Incubator was accepti

Re: Release manager for 1.7.1

Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi all, It's time to get a bug-fix release out, and again today we're getting messages from the user list asking for 1.7.1. I volunteer to be release manager (but would like an experienced hand to back me up procedurally and with svn branching etc). +1 Martijn ---

Re: [VOTE] Ben Burgess as committer

+1 Martijn Peter Reilly wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose Ben Burgess as a committer for the ant project, with a special interest in maintaining the starteam tasks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

Re: [VOTE] Weblogic and Starteam antlibs for ant 1.8.0

Yes - move the weblogic and starteam tasks to antlibs. [ ] No - keep them in ant 1.8.0 [ ] My vote is for Yes [X] Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e

Re: Vote: Proposed removal of the ant-type attribute

+1 Martijn Kevin Jackson schreef: +1 deprecate for 1.7.1 if no-one dissents Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: 1.7.x branch

+1 Martijn Matt Benson schreef: I'd like to create one. Any objections? -Matt Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on

Re: Probable bug found: scp task does not handle correctly directories containing subdirectories

Please verify this with an older (0.1.29) version of jsch or with the latest Ant (nightly build) before submitting a bugreport. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090 br Martijn Jean-Noël Rivasseau schreef: Hi, I posted this on the user list but noone answered, I have better

Re: [VOTE] drop java 1.2 support in ant 1.7.1 and later

This vote has passed as there were only votes in favour of dropping support of java 1.2 Martijn Martijn Kruithof schreef: Hi Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a clear result, here an official Vote request. Given the facts that 1) java 1.2 is EOL 2) java

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. Accordinly, I would like to call a vote about moving to JIRA [] Yes, move to JIRA [] No, stay with Bugzill

someone playing with bugzilla

I have marked all those bugreps as resolved / invalid, and added the developers list again, because the guy tried to hide his activity from us (he did this all on 18-4-2007) . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add

[VOTE] drop java 1.2 support in ant 1.7.1 and later

Hi Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a clear result, here an official Vote request. Given the facts that 1) java 1.2 is EOL 2) java 1.2 is not supported by the official ant 1.7.0 delivery 3) the problems running java 1.2 on some newer versions of operating sys

Re: minimum supported Java version

Steve Loughran schreef: OK, so we are java1.3+ now. Excellent. Could we make 1.3+ that (or even 1.4+) make official via a vote? Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: minimum supported Java version

I believe it still is Java 1.2. I cannot test the standard builds on it anymore and for my linux environment i cannot build and test it anymore. I remember some discussion from 2 years ago vaguely but can't remember if it came to a vote. I'd vote in favour of dropping support for both 1.2

Manual page

I have manually updated the api manual page at the ant website to display the original placeholder message. (now without the in-between frame pages, where things got broken) (For obvious reasons this page is not updated via svn.) If you see this page online at ant.apache.org, it is not a bug, b

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

Hi At least have a look at the status line on top of the log before searching for errors: Details * *State: *Success * *For: *Project: test-ant-no-xerces (passing since 1 run again) Martijn Antoine L

Re: vote: Remove javadoc2 for 1.8?

Hi I once tossed in an attempt to get rid of several deprecated tasks / attributes, which was declined in the end. I'd appreciate if we could set some documented policy on how we would like to handle deprecated 1) tasks / attributes as used in the build files. 2) methods and classes usable b

Nightlies

Hi It seems that the nighly builds do not pull the most recent changes (head) from svn (anymore). Antoine could you please have a look at what is going on? Br Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

automagic website update

Hi I have installed a cron job on people.apache.org to automatically update the web site. Any objections? Script: /home/jkf/updateweb #!/bin/tcsh cd /www/ant.apache.org /usr/local/bin/svn up | /usr/bin/grep -v "At revision" crontab: 57 2 * * * /home/jkf/updateweb br Martijn ---

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.0

Kevin Jackson schreef: Hi Stefan, +1 from me, the beta has been fine for a while now, so I'm more than happy to see a full release. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: Branch

Matt Benson schreef: --- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer to 1.7

Branch

Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AntUnit

Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef: Hi, I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1. It is a cool way of testing ant tasks. Regards, Antoine Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so definetely +1 here. Martijn Original-Nachricht Datum:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef: On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however documen

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however document that the official release does not work with jdk 1.2 Also in the WHATSNEW still t

Re: AW: JDK 1.2 compatibility

ng the testsuite (which needs time on my machine :-( ) Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2006 21:28 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: JDK 1.2 compatibility Peter Reilly schreef: On 11/24/06, M

Re: JDK 1.2 compatibility

Peter Reilly schreef: On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK

  1   2   3   >