Thanks Jaikiran!
(sorry for the late reply)
Maarten
Op dinsdag 1 april 2025 om 09:03:26 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
The gitbox repo is now up-to-date.
-Jaikiran
On 27/03/25 12:49 am, Maarten Coene wrote:
> Thanks Jaikiran!
> If I can do something to help you finding the issue,
s in
> progress (build number 55).
>
> We will have to check why the gitbox repo is either missing that new
> commit or not fetching the latest. I will check later today.
>
> -Jaikiran
>
> On 26/03/25 5:50 am, Maarten Coene wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I probably d
Hi,
I probably did something wrong and need some help from some git experts.
Yesterday, I pushed some fix to https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy, but
the CI build doesn't seem to pick up that change.
The last build https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ivy/52/ refers
to git revision a9eb9f168011
new features have been added.
Download the release at:
https://ant.apache.org/ivy/download.cgi
Issues should be reported to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY
More information can be found on the Apache Ivy website:
https://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene
With +1 votes from Stefan, Jaikiran, Martijn, Paul (non-binding) and me,
the vote has passed.
I'll continue the release process in the next couple of days.
Thank you all for voting.
Maarten
+1
Maarten
Op maandag 23 december 2024 om 14:12:14 CET schreef Maarten Coene
:
Hi all,
I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.5.3
The git tag of this release is:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/releases/tag/2.5.3
The artifacts has been published to:
https://dist.apache.org
My bad, I've fixed it now.
Maarten
Op woensdag 25 december 2024 om 18:56:13 CET schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
On 2024-12-25, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
> doap file is missing a tag between versions 2.5.3
> and 2.5.2. this should not be blocking in my view as doap seems not to
> be actually us
n the release procedure)
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
The vote will be open for at least 72 hoursand close no earlier than 26st
December 2024 14:00 UTC.
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene
Hi all,
good news, there will be no vote to retire the project for now.
I will maintain the Ivy project (but extra volunteers are still very welcome
!).
I'll try to look into some of the open issues and pull requests in the next
coming weeks and create a new release after that.
Maarten
Op
+1
Maarten
Op zondag 25 augustus 2024 om 17:20:41 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello everyone,
I've created RC2 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release:
git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2
on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/d
+1
Maarten
Op zondag 16 juni 2024 om 08:12:07 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello everyone,
4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions
of Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formalize
it (which is OK). The last release of Ant 1.9.x
+1
Maarten
Op donderdag 23 november 2023 om 08:19:22 CET schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
I'm really sorry and embarrassed but I seem to have misunderstood the
purpose of the Attic, it is not responsible for retiring subprojects,
only for top level projects like Ant as a whole with all subproje
+1
Maarten
Op zondag 19 november 2023 om 18:40:27 CET schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all,
within the "Future of Ivy and IvyDE" thread[1] I started about three
months ago to me it seemed as if people wouldn't be happy if IvyDE died
but I also didn't sense there was a community willing to k
Thanks Jaikiran!
Here is my vote: +1
Maarten
Op woensdag 16 augustus 2023 om 14:35:43 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello everyone,
I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release:
git tag: ANT_1.10.14_RC1
on commit: 53f19eccf49acf526415997046dca5a5135b0e8f
tarballs: h
Thanks Stefan!
Here is my vote: +1
Maarten
Op donderdag 17 augustus 2023 om 18:54:01 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release candidate for Ivy
2.5.2
Changelog:
- FIX:
Hi Stefan,
thanks for looking into this.
After having a quick look at the diffs and without being able to look into the
code myself, I think I prefer your approach to solve the issue.
Maybe Jaikiran can remember more details, but I'd go for backing out the
changes to IvyNodeUsage and push your
+1
Maarten
Op zondag 17 oktober 2021 09:02:30 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
+1.
- Used this version to build some of our internal projects.
- Checked some random manuals.
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I've created a new RC2 release candidate
+1
Maarten
Op donderdag 30 september 2021 04:58:56 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1
on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 5
+1
Maarten
Op zaterdag 10 juli 2021 20:51:38 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11:
git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1
on commit: 01ce0c3b1
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48767
Maven artifacts:
+1
Tested on our build infrastructure, no issues found.
Maarten
Op zaterdag 10 juli 2021 20:14:36 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
[re-send with fixed subject, sorry]
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on commit: ea698c454
tarballs: ht
+1
Maarten
Op zaterdag 3 juli 2021 14:41:50 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for AntUnit 1.4.1:
git tag: 1_4_1_RC1
on commit: e436acf
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/antunit/
revision: 48645
Maven artifa
+1
Maarten
Op maandag 12 april 2021 06:31:29 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.10:
git tag: ANT_1.10.10_RC1
on commit: eccd0a2ceb4fa854ee9f2a95cfea10d55a485dda
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 46988
+1
I could only do some minimal testing, no issues found.
Maarten
Op zondag 27 september 2020 12:29:02 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
as mentioned in my last mail the release contains a decision about
implementing Nashorn support for graal.js that hasn't been discussed
before.
Yes, excellent plan! :-)
Maarten
Op maandag 21 september 2020 08:32:06 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello Stefan,
This sounds fine to me.
-Jaikiran
On 21/09/20 12:00 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> now that Java 15 is out I'd like to cut a new 1.10 release with GraalVM
> Jav
Hi Stefan,
could you explain a bit more why we should EOL the 1.9.x branch?
Personally, I think it's a mistake to abondon the Java 5 support.
I think there are still projects around targetting java 5, 6 or 7 using Ant as
build tool.
For instance, one of the reasons we are still using Ant 1.9.x
+1
Maarten
Op zondag 10 mei 2020 16:59:23 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.8:
git tag: ANT_1.10.8_RC1
on commit: e04bc3455
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 39345
Maven artifacts:
ht
+1
I've tested this on our build infrastructure and all went fine :)
Maarten
Op zondag 10 mei 2020 16:16:49 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.15:
git tag: ANT_1.9.15_RC1
on commit: a03326036
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/d
Thanks for the report Patrick,
it seems this issue has already been fixed in git some time ago.
It should be available in an upcoming release or in a recent nightly build.
Maarten
Op donderdag 10 oktober 2019 20:24:50 CEST schreef ENJOLRAS Patrick
:
Hello,
Using Ivy 2.5.0 rc1
+1
Maarten
Op donderdag 2 mei 2019 16:16:42 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello all,
I've created a release candidate RC2 for 1.10.6. This release contains
bug fixes as well as enhancements.
The release was generated using JDK 11 version (to include JDK9+
features/tasks). The minimal re
Tested on our build infrastructure, no issues found.
+1Maarten
Op dinsdag 12 maart 2019 11:02:18 CET schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello all,
I've created a new release candidate for 1.9.14. This release contains
bug fixes as well as some enhancements.
Release notes:
https://dist.a
Without knowing the details of the change, one thing we should take care about
is that older Ivy versions should still be able to read that property properly.
Maarten
Op woensdag 29 augustus 2018 16:48:01 CEST schreef Gintautas Grigelionis
:
I like the idea, though. One thing that should
And the ModuleDescriptorMemoryCacheTest failure must be my fault.
I'll look into it later this week or next week.
Maarten
Van: Jaikiran Pai
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: vrijdag 24 augustus 9:02 2018
Onderwerp: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ivy-tests-ubuntu » ubuntu,JDK 1.7
(lat
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 05c88a60c2f8b427f3d3d4d9fbd5f71a05c6355b
Parents: 23a5135
Author: Maarten Coene
Authored: Wed Jul 25 13:55:48 2018 +0200
Committer: Maarten Coene
Committed: Wed Jul 25 13:55:48 2018 +0200
--
WHATSNEW
We did some minimal testing with this version in our build process.No issues
were found.
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 10 juli 11:55 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.5 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a new release candidate for 1
Tried this version in our build process.No issues were found.
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 10 juli 11:56 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.13 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a new release candidate for 1.9.13 with a few bug fixes.
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: vrijdag 22 juni 7:32 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.4 based on RC3
Hi all
this is the third RC for AntUnit 1.4 with the problems Gintas identified
fixed.
tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 juni 9:08 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.4 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a new release candidate for 1.10.4 with a bunch of bug
fixes and the "ZipSlip" adjustment.
git tag: ANT_1.10.4_RC1
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 juni 9:08 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.12 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a new release candidate for 1.9.12 with a bunch of bug
fixes and the "ZipSlip" adjustment.
git tag: ANT_1_9_12_RC1
Converting an Enumeration to a List just for iterating it doesn't seem
performance and memory wise a good idea to me.
Maarten
Van: "gin...@apache.org"
Aan: notificati...@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: woensdag 16 mei 19:13 2018
Onderwerp: [1/2] ant git commit: Deprecate CollectionUtils and
Hi,
I've committed a change to ModuleDescriptorMemoryCache.Where should I document
this change? Is it 'release-notes.adoc'?
Maarten
+1
I couldn't test the Ant tasks though as we still run Ant with Java 6.
Maarten
Van: Nicolas Lalevée
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: donderdag 12 april 18:29 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Ivy 2.5.0-rc1 Release
I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.5.0-rc1.
The git tag of this
tatic initializer.
thanks,Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: donderdag 5 april 8:25 2018
Onderwerp: Re: JunitTestRunner commit
On 2018-04-04, Maarten Coene wrote:
> Since this is more or less my first commit to the Ant codebase, could
> someone please revie
ommit/f2459248
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/tree/f2459248
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/diff/f2459248
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: f2459248f23aa439e2c5ab642d9d9d7e6cffc933
Parents: 277906b 26c8789
Author: Maarten Coene
Authored: Thu Apr 5 11:32:22 2018 +0200
Hi,
Since this is more or less my first commit to the Ant codebase, could someone
please review my change to JunitTestRunner ?And if all is ok, what is the
correct way to merge this into the 1.9.x branch?
Maarten
+1
I couldn't test this version though...so I only verified that it contained the
license and other required files.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: zaterdag 24 maart 13:48 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.3 based on RC2
Hi all
I've created a
+1
We tested this version in our build environment, no issues were found.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 maart 18:31 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.11 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.11:
git tag: ANT_
+1
We did test this version in our environment, no issues were found.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: zaterdag 3 februari 17:32 2018
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.10 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.10:
git tag: ANT_
Without looking at the JIRA issue, the 'specification' of what 'A;B' should do
is explained here:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/ivyfile/dependency.html
without a defaultconfmapping set the following should be equivalent:
A;B = A->A;B->B
Maarten
Van: Gintautas Grigeli
The change to the URLHandler class (TimoutConstraint) is also backwards
incompatible.The IvyIdea plugin (IntelliJ) breaks on this which contains an
extension of AbstractURLHandler.
I didn't look into it yet, maybe it can be changed to be more backwards
compatible?
kind regards,Maarten
V
Jaikiran,
probably only reproducible on a Windows machine...
Maarten
Van: Aurélien Pupier
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: maandag 25 september 13:41 2017
Onderwerp: Re: Error while testing 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT
Hello Jaikiran,
Source repositories implicated are:
- Fuse Tooling: https
test master of upstream, which created this
merge commit.
-Jaikiran
On 12/07/17 1:45 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
>
> Any idea where this commit comes from?I didn't touch any of these files as
> far as I know...
> Maarten
>
>
> - Doorgestuurd bericht
+1
Maarten
Van: Jan Matèrne (jhm)
Aan: 'Ant Developers List'
Verzonden: woensdag 12 juli 6:59 2017
Onderwerp: AW: [VOTE] IvyDE requirements
summa summarum +2 ;-)
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Gintautas Grigelionis [mailto:g.grigelio...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Die
-ivy/tree/1a36ae09
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy/diff/1a36ae09
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 1a36ae09d2848d687895532acf46531437721692
Parents: 585a702 dcaacf4
Author: Maarten Coene
Authored: Wed Jul 12 10:05:54 2017 +0200
Committer: Maarten Coene
Commit
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 6 juni 6:26 2017
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC2
On 2017-06-01, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I've created a new release candidate for Compress Antlib 1.5, this time
> with working I
I don't see how Ivy could resolve the old ant-compress ivy.xml files without
using very special artifact patterns.So my guess is that Ivy users of
ant-compress just use the pom.xml file.
So I'd say we should fix the ivy.xml.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonde
e Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1
Maarten, Jan
right now this only has my implicit vote. Would you be more inclined to
vote if the date was included inside the changelog? If so, I'll re-roll
the release.
Stefan
On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote:
> Why not simply ?That is th
:bode...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 09:46
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1
On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote:
> The changes.xml still contains the following line: date="unreleased">
> I'm not sure this sho
The changes.xml still contains the following line:
I'm not sure this should block the release, but I think it would be better to
fill in the correct date.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 30 mei 20:28 2017
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Compress Antli
Yes, but it's not because Ivy is compiled with Java 5 that you cannot run it
with Java 7 to have TLS1.2 support.
Maarten
Van: Gintautas Grigelionis
Aan: Ant Developers List ; Maarten Coene
Verzonden: vrijdag 19 mei 9:20 2017
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Increase minimum Java versio
I think we should stick to Java5 as long as Ant 1.9.x is actively
maintained.This keeps Ivy usable for both Ant 1.9.x and Ant 1.10.x
Or are there good reasons to increase the minimum Java version, like features
that cannot be implemented with Java 5?
But since I don't have the time at the moment
I couldn't test it, but based on the content it looks ok to me
+1
Maarten
Van: Antoine Levy Lambert
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: maandag 6 februari 1:10 2017
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.1 based on RC1
+1 Antoine
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 2:33 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
We didn't find any issues while testing this RC.
+1
Maarten
Van: Antoine Levy Lambert
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: maandag 6 februari 1:34 2017
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.9 based on RC1
+ 1
Antoine
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> Hi al
Agreed.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: vrijdag 13 januari 13:19 2017
Onderwerp: Thoughts on Next Release
Hi all,
it looks as if the wrapper script still didn't work on Solaris 10 and
also I seem to have broken Eclipse integration. The later has alre
Stefan,
I couldn't test this 1.10.0 release since our buildscripts are not compatible
with Java 8.(we have some javascript that are not compatible with the new java
8 javascript engine)
I could only check the git tag and the binaries and they looks ok to me.So here
is my +1 vote.
kind regards,
Sorry Stefan for the late response,
We already did some testing with the 1.9.8 and we didn't encounter any
problems.So here is my +1.
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: donderdag 29 december 19:56 2016
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.8 based on RC1
Thanks Stefan,
I prefer a 1.9.8 release since we are still using Java 6 and we are suffering
from the wrapper script issues.Personally I think the 'new feature'-set is a
bit too small to have a 1.10.0 release, but I can follow Jan to create it
nontheless as a signal.
Maarten
Van: Jan Ma
Thanks Jaikran,
I will look at your patches, I'll try to do it this week.If possible, please
attach a junit test as well to reproduce the problem.
About the release, the master branch already contains some fixes since the
2.4.0 release. They are listed in the release-notes.html in the 'doc'
dir
Thanks Jaikiran! :-)
I'll try to review it ...
kind regards,Maarten
Van: Jaikiran Pai
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: woensdag 7 december 18:17 2016
Onderwerp: Re: AW: Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?
Thank you. Given that there does seem to be willingness to d
Anyone an idea why this is failing and can someone fix it?I would try to do
this myself, but I don't have the necessary permissions on Jenkins.
regards,Maarten
- Doorgestuurd bericht -
Van: Apache Jenkins Server
Aan: notificati...@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: woensdag 9 november
Stefan,I can help testing these changes on Solaris.
regards,Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org; u...@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: maandag 10 oktober 18:07 2016
Onderwerp: Any Solaris / HP-UX Users out here?
Hi all
we've received several reports about the ant wrapper
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: zaterdag 9 april 12:03 2016
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.7 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.7:
git tag: ANT_197_RC1
on commit: cecbf5c
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos
I'd prefer moving to Java6, since there are still companies using Java6 or
Java7.Is Java8 really required to implement some of the new features?The more
JDK's we support, the more people can make use of Ant!
However, since I'm not that active in the Ant development, I won't block the
vote for t
+1
Maarten
Van: Conor MacNeill
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: maandag 5 oktober 11:06 2015
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Stephen Haberman as a committer
I would like to nominate Stephen Haberman as a committer. Stephen has
submitted a number of well tested patches to the Ivy codebase. I
b
+1
I've tested this release against several builds without any problems :)
Maarten
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Cc:
Verzonden: zondag 31 mei 16:46 2015
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.5 based on RC1
Hi all
I've created a release candidate
I'm not a fan of this proposal, I like it that Ivy doesn't has any dependencies
when using standard resolvers.
Perhaps it could be added to the documentation that if you use the URLresolver
for large uploads you'll have to add httpclient to the classpath?
Maarten
- Oorspronkelijk berich
+1
Maarten
Van: Nicolas Lalevée
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: zaterdag 13 december 17:45 2014
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Ivy 2.4.0 Release - take 2
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.4.0
The svn tag of this release is:
https://git-wip-us.apache
; Maarten Coene
Verzonden: woensdag 12 november 10:05 2014
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.4.0
+1 for expect the style folder
Where does this style folder is ? Is it somewhere in SVN / GIT ?
2014-11-10 0:24 GMT+01:00 Maarten Coene :
> Thank you for creating the release Nico
Thank you for creating the release Nicolas :-)
I've noticed that the "style" directory is missing in the documentation in
apache-ivy-2.4.0-bin.zip (and probably the others too).
This makes the documentation inside these binaries look a bit 'basic'.
Maarten
Va
If I remember correctly, the 2.4.0-RC1 also introduced some other very annoying
bugs, these fixes should be included in the 2.4.0 release as well imho.
I whish I could help you with it Nicolas, but I also have too little time which
will be needed for the first release on git.
(In fact, my very v
I did some commit tests on Ivy and it seems ok.
Could someone also change the configuration on Jenkins?
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: zondag 25 mei 20:55 2014
Onderwerp: Re: migration to git : next steps
On 2014-05-23, an
+1
Tested with a more or less complex Ant/Ivy build.
Maarten
Van: Antoine Levy Lambert
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: woensdag 30 april 5:46 2014
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.4 (second attempt)
Hi all,
restarting the vote thread after having f
We'll give this new version a try on our more or less complex Ant/Ivy build
Maarten
Van: Jan Matèrne (jhm)
Aan: 'Ant Developers List'
Verzonden: woensdag 30 april 9:20 2014
Onderwerp: AW: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.4 (second attempt)
So a +1 from me.
But r
Probably because I don't know much about git, but I don't see the real
advantage of the switch from SVN to git.
In addition, I don't have the time to help adapting the Ivy release
process/scripts.
But I don't want to stand in the way if everyone thinks this should be done.
So, my vote is:
for I
I'm happy with Subversion, so for me there is no need to switch to git.
Maarten
Van: Jean-Louis Boudart
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: maandag 14 april 8:24 2014
Onderwerp: Migrating to Git
HI there,
Since write git repository are accessible for a w
Thanks!
I'll try to have a look at it soon.
Maarten
Van: Josh Suereth
Aan: Ant Developers List ; Maarten Coene
Verzonden: dinsdag 1 april 21:47 2014
Onderwerp: Re: Ivy performance fix
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1465
On Tue,
Should I add this release to http://ant.apache.org/index.html?
Or is that only reserved for final releases?
Maarten
Van: Maarten Coene
Aan: ant-dev
Verzonden: dinsdag 1 april 22:43 2014
Onderwerp: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ivy 2.4.0-RC1 released
The Apache Ivy
://ant.apache.org/ivy/download.cgi
More information can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene
Hi Josh,
yes I think we can merge this in the 2.4.0 final release, but we'll have to
review a bit in more detail first.
However, could you create a JIRA issue containing a link to the patch?
thanks!
Maarten
Van: Antoine Levy Lambert
Aan: Ant Developers List
Hi Josh,
The junit tests should all pass when you run them with Ant.
On what platform do you run them and what is the error you get?
Maarten
Van: Josh Suereth
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: vrijdag 28 maart 20:48 2014
Onderwerp: Ivy tests not passing
A short update about the release progress:
- the binaries are published and the website is updated.
- I still have to create the Eclipse plugin, I'll try to do it this weekend.
Maarten
Van: Maarten Coene
Aan: ant-dev
Verzonden: maandag 24 maart
Maybe a bit late, but what was the reason to use a ThreadLocal here?
This gives issues when the configuration of Ivy (for instance setting a custom
logger) is done from a different thread than the actual resolve.
Maarten
Van: "cdu...@apache.org"
Aan: notifica
Hi all,
I'm glad to announce that the vote for the Apache Ivy 2.4.0-rc1 release has
passed with 4 +1 votes.
I'll continue the release process during the next couple of days.
Maarten
Almost forgot to vote myself :-)
+1
Maarten
Van: Maarten Coene
Aan: ant-dev
Verzonden: zaterdag 15 maart 23:17 2014
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Apache Ivy 2.4.0-rc1 Release
Hi all,
I have built Apache Ivy 2.4.0-rc1.
Here are the links:
SVN tag: https
Hi Stefan,
good questions. I don't know if this is intentional, but it happens to be
implemented that way in the build files for a long time. These hasn't been
changed, so I guess this was the same in the previous Ivy releases. Do you
think we should change it and is this blocking for this rele
you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Kind regards,
Maarten Coene
No problem Charles,
I can finish the release for you unless there are other candidates who want to
give it a try?
thanks,
Maarten
Van: Charles Duffy
Aan: Ant Developers List
Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 16:47 2014
Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.4.0-rc1 Releas
For Ivy we should stick to the same minimal JDK version as Ant. (JDK 1.5)
For IvyDE we could upgrade to the mimimal JDK version required for Eclipse.
(JDK 1.6)
So:
[ ] we should continue to support Java 1.4
[X] we should make Ivy require Java 5
[X] we should make IvyDE require Java 6
Maart
Could you please attach your patch to the JIRA issue?
Thanks!
Maarten
Van: Jerry Maloney
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 3:37 2013
Onderwerp: [PATCH] IVY-1436
This patch fixes the issue I described in
https://issues.apache.org/ji
+1
Maarten
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 juli 13:04 2013
Onderwerp: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.2
Hi all,
a very small release with some bugfixes in addition to the workaround
for Oracle's javadoc vulnerability.
I propose t
Hi Tim,
I like the idea, so a patch would be grealty appreciated.
There already exists a very old JIRA issue for this, so you can attach your
patch to that one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-439
thanks,
Maarten
Van: Tim Enderling
Aan: 'Ant Devel
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo