Re: Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-19 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I suspect this isn't what was intended for the build listener, but I've been using it to override the build.xml for tasks. In startTask I ensure that haltonerror and haltonfailure are set to false. Next up I want to ensure t

Re: Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-18 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri: Did you ever get this working? -Matt Sorry, was working on it on Saturday but then an unhappy 2 year old intervened before the reply was finished. Replying below, thanks for the followup. On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Is that going to be imposs

Re: Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that going to be impossible for subtags, or do I > just need to grok > how UnknownElements work etc? Am I being dense here? I haven't grasped why you need to use UEs

Re: Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/14/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: > Reading the presetdef manual page, it sounds like it's not what I want > because it only sets defaults and not mandated values. I don't want to > allow the build.xml to change the settings

Re: Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-13 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/13/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: > I suspect this isn't what was intended for the build listener, but > I've been using it to override the build.xml for tasks. In > startTask I ensure that haltonerror and haltonfailure are set t

Abusing the BuildListener

2006-07-12 Thread Henri Yandell
I suspect this isn't what was intended for the build listener, but I've been using it to override the build.xml for tasks. In startTask I ensure that haltonerror and haltonfailure are set to false. Next up I want to ensure there is always a , but adding a new task in seems a lot more painful than

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-09-03 Thread Henri Yandell
On 9/3/05, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let's do this Saturday, 3rd Sept, 20:00 EST. > > Any last minute change of plans? Nothing, apart from me starting an hour late because my son is cuter than you guys :) > Let us know how this goes, and thanks > of lot for doing this fo

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-31 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/30/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yves Martin wrote: > > > I propose to install a post-commit hook in subversion to keep cvs up-to-date > > even with read-only access: > > http://sam.zoy.org/writings/programming/svn2cvs.html > > > > > That would be nice! Would be nice, but giv

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-31 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/31/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > >Conor: Any time when you'd like the migration to happen? > > > >Hen > > > > > > > Hello, > > since we had a positive vote [1] to migrate

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-28 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/28/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Conor MacNeill wrote: > > >The following link goes through the basics. After that it is all pretty > >straightforward. > > > >http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html > > > >If you have particular issues, just yell out > > > Thanks, Conor.

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-27 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/20/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/16/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 on the migration, or rather +0.5 since I don't know much help I'm > > going to be right now (adapting to a different timing schema afte

Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/12/05, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I´m just getting the results of the vote. But I´m not sure which action from > >the bylaws > >to use. An "Adoption of New Codebase" needs 2/3 majority of committers which > >we havent (~ 1/3). > >Many committers h

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/16/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looks like it just needs to go into a core/. > > Structure looks fine, although we probably don't need that many tags > (we can remo

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-11 Thread Henri Yandell
Any further thoughts migration-wise? Did you get your stuff done Steve? Hen On 8/1/05, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have some things I'd like to commit (and then tag and delete), and > before that I need to do some changes to Get; if I can get those done > quickly then I'm +1

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-04 Thread Henri Yandell
lready proposed > a layout. > > It needs to incorporate the antlibs directories (already in svn). > Also, antidote is no longer supported, and should not > be placed in svn - unless someone wants to maintain it. > > Peter > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > >To a

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-02 Thread Henri Yandell
To accompany the ongoing vote, I've setup a test Ant migration. https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/trunk ant I've made the huge assumption that the Ant TLP have only one codebase and haven't structured it in an umbrella way. I'm not sure if ant-an

Subversion migration?

2005-07-29 Thread Henri Yandell
Talked a little with Stefan offline about when/whether you guys would be interested in an svn migration. He'd said that you wanted to migrate before the Ant 1.7? Looking at the Ant CVS structure, it looks pretty basic and could be done pretty quickly without much work on your parts. Hen ---