On 7/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect this isn't what was intended for the build listener, but
I've been using it to override the build.xml for tasks. In
startTask I ensure that haltonerror and haltonfailure are set to
false. Next up I want to ensure t
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri: Did you ever get this working?
-Matt
Sorry, was working on it on Saturday but then an unhappy 2 year old
intervened before the reply was finished. Replying below, thanks for
the followup.
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is that going to be imposs
On 7/14/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that going to be impossible for subtags, or do I
> just need to grok
> how UnknownElements work etc?
Am I being dense here? I haven't grasped why you need
to use UEs
On 7/14/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Reading the presetdef manual page, it sounds like it's not what I want
> because it only sets defaults and not mandated values. I don't want to
> allow the build.xml to change the settings
On 7/13/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
> I suspect this isn't what was intended for the build listener, but
> I've been using it to override the build.xml for tasks. In
> startTask I ensure that haltonerror and haltonfailure are set t
I suspect this isn't what was intended for the build listener, but
I've been using it to override the build.xml for tasks. In
startTask I ensure that haltonerror and haltonfailure are set to
false. Next up I want to ensure there is always a , but adding a new task in seems a lot more painful than
On 9/3/05, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let's do this Saturday, 3rd Sept, 20:00 EST.
>
> Any last minute change of plans?
Nothing, apart from me starting an hour late because my son is cuter
than you guys :)
> Let us know how this goes, and thanks
> of lot for doing this fo
On 8/30/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yves Martin wrote:
>
> > I propose to install a post-commit hook in subversion to keep cvs up-to-date
> > even with read-only access:
> > http://sam.zoy.org/writings/programming/svn2cvs.html
> >
> >
> That would be nice!
Would be nice, but giv
On 8/31/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> >Conor: Any time when you'd like the migration to happen?
> >
> >Hen
> >
> >
> >
> Hello,
>
> since we had a positive vote [1] to migrate
On 8/28/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
> >The following link goes through the basics. After that it is all pretty
> >straightforward.
> >
> >http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html
> >
> >If you have particular issues, just yell out
> >
> Thanks, Conor.
On 8/20/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/16/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +1 on the migration, or rather +0.5 since I don't know much help I'm
> > going to be right now (adapting to a different timing schema afte
On 8/12/05, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I´m just getting the results of the vote. But I´m not sure which action from
> >the bylaws
> >to use. An "Adoption of New Codebase" needs 2/3 majority of committers which
> >we havent (~ 1/3).
> >Many committers h
On 8/16/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Looks like it just needs to go into a core/.
>
> Structure looks fine, although we probably don't need that many tags
> (we can remo
Any further thoughts migration-wise?
Did you get your stuff done Steve?
Hen
On 8/1/05, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have some things I'd like to commit (and then tag and delete), and
> before that I need to do some changes to Get; if I can get those done
> quickly then I'm +1
lready proposed
> a layout.
>
> It needs to incorporate the antlibs directories (already in svn).
> Also, antidote is no longer supported, and should not
> be placed in svn - unless someone wants to maintain it.
>
> Peter
>
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> >To a
To accompany the ongoing vote, I've setup a test Ant migration.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/trunk ant
I've made the huge assumption that the Ant TLP have only one codebase
and haven't structured it in an umbrella way. I'm not sure if
ant-an
Talked a little with Stefan offline about when/whether you guys would
be interested in an svn migration.
He'd said that you wanted to migrate before the Ant 1.7?
Looking at the Ant CVS structure, it looks pretty basic and could be
done pretty quickly without much work on your parts.
Hen
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
