RE: OpenVMS execution

2006-05-15 Thread Hazzard, Powell
Stefan wrote: >>>... and break backwards compatibility with 1.6. I'd rather introduce the flip but make it default to Ant 1.6's behavior. I understand, hence we original suggested a property which flipped the default behavior (Unix style or 1.6 behavior OpenVMS style). See: http://issues.apac

RE: OpenVMS execution

2006-05-12 Thread Hazzard, Powell
Steve Loughran: >>If there are some executables with unix result code logic, and other bits with VMS rules, then its essentially >>>impossible to "automatically" >>>make the right decision. >>>We could switch to unix-policy-everywhere, with a per- flip to VMS if you want run VMS-specific apps. M

RE: Question about property name

2006-05-02 Thread Hazzard, Powell
Steve, Sorry for the delay. >>I guess if JBoss shows the problem, then yes, some kind of external control makes sense. But having one big >>switch that suddenly flips the response processing over is scary, very scary, because Execute() is used everywhere, >>even in things like Java.

RE: Question about property name

2006-04-21 Thread Hazzard, Powell
Thanks Meg, for the introduction. Hello Steve, My name is Powell Hazzard and I am one of the original OpenVMS Java engineers. I have also worked other Open Source products like Tomcat, Mozilla... I'm currently working with Meg regarding understanding (and hopefully resolving) the Ant j