On 2022-02-09, Matt Benson wrote:
> Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
> continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?
We still create Ant 1.9.x releases from time to time and 1.9.x would not
be able to use newer releases. Having sai
tsmock commented on pull request #175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/175#issuecomment-1034936800
I ended up updating the JUnit5 versions to get some of their newer testing
methods for testing JUnit extensions. In any case, from what _I_ know, there
shouldn't be any effect on `ant
I saw the Windows related failure and will fix it today.
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 11:16 PM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello Matt,
>
> That job keeps failing every other time. I haven't had a chance to
> understand why it fails nor do I know what that job is for. I think you
> can ignore tha
