Hello Jan,
On 08/02/22 12:04 pm, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:53 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Earl,
On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote:
How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to
test
their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security manag
Hello Stefan,
On 08/02/22 1:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2022-02-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So the launch scripts (the Linux one and the .bat for Windows one)
have both been updated to set this system property only for Java 18
and 19. I expect this to be a temporary thing till the new API is
a
+1.
No objections. A while back I had thought of proposing this. The worry I
had/have was that doing some of these refactoring might introduce hard
to catch regressions in the core of Ivy itself (which I personally
haven't fully had a grasp of yet). Having said that, targetting Ivy
against Ja
Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?
Matt
Java 7 public updates have ended nearly 7 years ago. Looking over the Ivy
codebase, there appear to be many opportunities for modernization using
Java 8 features (new APIs, interface default methods, etc.). Does anyone
object to, or have other thoughts on this upgrade?
Matt
