janmaterne commented on issue #83: Add HTML validation check
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/83#issuecomment-470836739
This PR can't be responsible for the failing tests as the sources or test
files are not touched.
Failing tests are:
src.tests.antunit.types.resources.
janmaterne commented on issue #83: Add HTML validation check
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/83#issuecomment-470832663
Tool "Copyright (c) 2013-2018 Mozilla Foundation"
(https://github.com/validator/validator/blob/master/src/nu/validator/client/SimpleCommandLineValidator.java),
so
janmaterne commented on issue #83: Add HTML validation check
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/83#issuecomment-470825471
Just summarize/quote the link contents:
- **doctype**: that declaration was used in HTML5 to distinguish between a
standards-compliant parsing mode and a so-call
janmaterne commented on issue #83: Add HTML validation check
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/83#issuecomment-470824474
Thanks for the links, sounds reasonable.
Two things I found:
1. maybe you should add a short paragraph in the section
like for the other tools
twogee commented on issue #83: Add HTML validation check
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/83#issuecomment-470576630
Recommendations re [doctype](https://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/Doctype), [language
declaration](https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-html-language-declarations),
[sc
twogee commented on issue #83: Add HTML validation check
URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/83#issuecomment-470478712
The goal is to follow HTML 5 spec (except for index.html where we still have
frames).
What is missing is doctype and lang attribute instead of meta tags.
scope at
