On 2018-03-29, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> IMHO sbt fork happened because Ivy was not using Git then.
I don't understand. Either they have changed Ivy or could have used
binaries. If they had to change Ivy the question is what did they have
to change.
> So my idea is to graft their branch ont
IMHO sbt fork happened because Ivy was not using Git then.
GitHub shows clearly that the fork was created off Ivy repo clone created
by EasyAnt (which is dormant now).
So my idea is to graft their branch onto Ivy repo whereupon EasyAnt-derived
clones can be mothballed.
What happens next is an open
On 2018-03-25, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> I asked sbt developers [1] whether they would like to use the same Git
> repo. The consensus seems to be that sbt would like to have their own
> branch (or two). Would it be acceptable to graft sbt branch(es) to Ivy repo?
I'm not sure I understand the
