[GitHub] ant issue #52: [master] Fix BZ-58451 BZ-58833

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/21/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #52: [master] Fix BZ-58451 BZ-58833

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/15/ --- --

[GitHub] ant issue #53: Optional libraries for Ant 1.10

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/53 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/20/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #53: Optional libraries for Ant 1.10

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/53 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/14/ --- --

[GitHub] ant pull request #53: Optional libraries for Ant 1.10

2017-12-19 Thread twogee
GitHub user twogee opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/53 Optional libraries for Ant 1.10 A bit unsure about JRuby: should we stay with 1.7 for a while or go for 9? In any case, would jruby-core be sufficient, or should jruby-stdlib be added, too? You can mer

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/19/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/13/ --- --

[GitHub] ant pull request #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-19 Thread twogee
Github user twogee closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-19 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 I squashed the commits so the change is easier to apply to 1.9.x --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For addit

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/18/ ---

[GitHub] ant issue #50: Use newer third party libraries

2017-12-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/12/ --- --

Re: ant git commit: disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as well

2017-12-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 19/12/17 5:13 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Looking at the JDK code, I still am not sure which exact code path triggers this stale/invalid cache in this specific case, but apparently it does. Now that we know the canonical path cache is playing a role, I think the only way this issue makes se

Re: ant git commit: disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as well

2017-12-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-12-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > That was it! :) The same old canonical path cache. Yes :-) I'll try to clean up a little and write a test for the content of the record stage. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.

Re: ant git commit: disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as well

2017-12-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
That was it! :) The same old canonical path cache. Looking at the JDK code, I still am not sure which exact code path triggers this stale/invalid cache in this specific case, but apparently it does. [exec] [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix.SymlinkTest [ex

Re: ant git commit: logs say "link has been created", is it a timing issue?

2017-12-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
OK, I'm not listing the contents of the test dir Content of /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux/jdk/JDK 1.8 (latest)/build/testcases/tmp/testoutput_19459_main/symtest1 is /dirlink:/dirlink2/fileA:/dirlink2/fileB:/dirlink2/fileC:/dirlink3/file2:/dirlink3/link3:/dir

Re: ant git commit: logs say "link has been created", is it a timing issue?

2017-12-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-12-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > The interesting bit from the logs that you enabled for investigating > this appears to be the contents in the "recorded.links" properties > file that gets created in the "test-record" target: > #listing properties#Tue Dec 19 09:28:22 UTC 2017 > dirlink=/home/j

Re: ant git commit: logs say "link has been created", is it a timing issue?

2017-12-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
The interesting bit from the logs that you enabled for investigating this appears to be the contents in the "recorded.links" properties file that gets created in the "test-record" target: #listing properties#Tue Dec 19 09:28:22 UTC 2017 dirlink=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Ant-Build-Ma