Thank you, Gintas
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user bodewig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/68b846a4c27361cce2b6d7e9c60ca697f980913e#commitcomment-25935605
In src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java:
In src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java on line 778:
bigger
Github user twogee commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/68b846a4c27361cce2b6d7e9c60ca697f980913e#commitcomment-25932714
In src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java:
In src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java on line 778:
For jdk
Hi Gintas
we frequently merge changes from the 1.9.x branch to master and this
will become quite a bit harder if files in the two branches differ by
whitespace.
Do you think you could run whatever tool you've used on the 1.9.x branch
as well?
Thanks
Stefan
-
On 2017-11-29, dalibor topic wrote:
> On 28.11.2017 18:14, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> When do you expect to know whether JEP 313 is going to make it into
>> Java10?
> By Monday, December 4th, per
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2017-November/000278.html
> .
Thanks, I stumbled ove
On 2017-11-29, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> In their JEP[1] (based on which this got implemented), it does
> recommend relying on this "java.specification.version" whose value is
> expected to be an integer (for Java releases starting Java 9).
Yes, I've implemented a possible way to deal with it in a br
On 28.11.2017 18:14, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-11-28, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
*JDK 10 Early Access build 33 is available at : - **jdk.java.net/10/*
Good news, I've bootstrapped Ant's master branch and run all tests
without any failure.
Excellent - thank you for testing!
Of the JEPs sc