Re: Early Access builds of JDK 8u112 b03, JDK 9 b128 are available on java.net

On 01.08.2016 16:32, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2016-08-01, dalibor topic wrote: I'd also suggest a sideways glance at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42838 again, in light of the current minimal platform requirements for Ant. Sure, unfortunately the ticket only has people with

Re: Early Access builds of JDK 8u112 b03, JDK 9 b128 are available on java.net

On 31.07.2016 10:27, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all Ant's master branch is down to a single test failure apart from the JAI problems on my local machine. Great! An error I've overlooked when I initially reported the problems I've found It looks as if

Re: Early Access builds of JDK 8u112 b03, JDK 9 b128 are available on java.net

On 2016-08-01, dalibor topic wrote: > I'd also suggest a sideways glance at > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42838 again, in light > of the current minimal platform requirements for Ant. Sure, unfortunately the ticket only has people with strong opinions but no code attached to it

Re: Early Access builds of JDK 8u112 b03, JDK 9 b128 are available on java.net

On 28.07.2016 12:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If I understand this correctly the switch to CLDR has the potential to break the assumptions about the patterns used by DateFormat.SHORT and friends - if so I'd ask you to mark this change more prominently as one with the potential to break existing c