Hello Jesse,
can this problem with the junit-frames.xsl wait for ant 1.9.1 ?
I feel like making another release in one month to 6 weeks from now.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:20 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
>
> Jesse Glick
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to :
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches
of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit.
Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time.
Let' start with my own +1
Regards,
Antoine
Hi,
yes, I also noticed the failure of this XMLResultAggregatorTest and came to the
conclusion that the junitreport stylesheet needed to be changed.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 08:45 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
>> Reproducible locally when running
Hello Jesse,
yes, this line was intentional, I wanted to avoid leaving ugly ${tmp.dir}
directories on the hard disk.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 05:29 AM, anto...@apache.org wrote:
>> adding hamcrest to the lib/optional because it is required
On 03/05/2013 08:45 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
Reproducible locally when running on Java 7. Not yet sure what it means but it
looks bad.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu
On 03/04/2013 11:25 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in junit-test.xml
Now fixed? Reports:
skipping tests since it fails when using JUnit 4
But there is one genuine failure I know about, which predates @Ignore support:
https://builds.ap
On 03/05/2013 08:29 PM, jgl...@apache.org wrote:
-if (annotation != null && annotation.value() != null &&
!annotation.value().isEmpty()) {
+if (annotation != null && annotation.value().length() > 0) {
(And yes removing the null check was intentional—annotation values ar
On 03/05/2013 05:29 AM, anto...@apache.org wrote:
adding hamcrest to the lib/optional because it is required at runtime for some
tests, also bumping junit dependency in pom file
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/junit.xml?rev=1452722&r1=145272
No problemo Michael
Its a good thing you caught this bug before we put it on any of the Apache
distros
Martin Gainty
__
Build and test locally ...deploy ONLY when you have passed all
testcases..Personal Quote
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 18:24:06 +000
It looks like my patch to fix JUnit Ignore notifications has broken
compilation on Java 1.5 machines. I've fixed this in the attached patch by
replacing !String#isEmpty() calls with String#length() !=0 and removing
@Override annotations on implementations of interface methods.
Sorry for breaking t
I did not find the time to make a new build last night, it will be for my NYC
evening.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> In fact I found out that I need to add ham crest on the class path, this was
> probably meant by the patch but I did not notice tha
11 matches
Mail list logo
