Thanks very much, Antoine. It's appreciated.
On 13-01-31 06:11 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hello Bruce,
I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this
should be pretty straightforward.
I will work on this this week-end.
Regards,
Antoine
---
Hello Matt,
I have seen that you started upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase.
I do not see myself going systematically in the codebase to do that because I
do not have the time to do it.
I will look to see whether there are failures in Gump.
I also got some failures running the unit
Hello Bruce,
I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this
should be pretty straightforward.
I will work on this this week-end.
Regards,
Antoine
On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> We've discussed this before[1] and already voted in favour of rem
We've discussed this before[1] and already voted in favour of removing
the commercial tasks from Ant some time ago[2]. A complication was that
we wanted to create AntLibs for them if we couldn't get the vendors to
support them directly so that there was minimal upset for our users, but
apart fr
Hi Antoine,
I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase
some months back. At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump
which I wasn't able to understand. It might be nice to figure this out and
finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0.
br,
Matt
On Wed, Jan 3
