It is indeed nicer. committed.
Nicolas
Le 30 juil. 2012 à 23:48, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit :
>
> Le 30 juil. 2012 à 23:25, Matt Benson a écrit :
>
>> Can't this be done more cleanly by internally wrapping all if/unless
>> to a Condition instance?
>
> I haven't thought of that.
> Probably it wil
Le 30 juil. 2012 à 23:25, Matt Benson a écrit :
> Can't this be done more cleanly by internally wrapping all if/unless
> to a Condition instance?
I haven't thought of that.
Probably it will make the test of executability simpler, but not the setter. I
will try something.
Nicolas
>
> Matt
>
Can't this be done more cleanly by internally wrapping all if/unless
to a Condition instance?
Matt
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> Author: hibou
> Date: Mon Jul 30 21:13:02 2012
> New Revision: 1367306
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1367306&view=rev
> Log:
> Allow Condition
I have looked into the actual implementation details, actually I don't need
much. So little that I have committed them, it will be easier to review, easier
than writing about it in an email. If I can do this with a PropertyHelper, I'll
revert and use the non intrusive way.
Nicolas
Le 28 juil.
It's been a pet peeve of mine that ant gives so little information when a java
class that it's running fails. I hacked my version to print "Java class
Error #", which makes it much easier to figure out who broke what,
especially in the case where someones code generator silently dies.
Since thi
