Quick update for anyone who's curious.
I'd forgotten that I'd asked much the same question on the ant-user list
back on May 31. This was back when the contamination of the child classpath
with the parent classpath was literally causing the tests to fail. And same
as with this thread, Nicolas L. wa
+1
On Jul 14, 2012 9:41 PM, "Bruce Atherton" wrote:
> I think this is a great idea, particularly if we can get the committers of
> EasyAnt interested in improving Ant and Ivy.
>
> +1.
>
> Would it be worthwhile to consider all the committers on EasyAnt as
> committers on Ant if this is adopted? A
On 12-07-19 02:50 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote:
> This topic doesn't look like popular :)
>
> Should we consider this silence as a "no go"?
Well, I haven't seen any disagreement with the proposal. It looks more
like just a general lack of participation in the dev group, partly from
the fact tha
Le 19 juil. 2012 à 11:50, Jean-Louis Boudart a écrit :
> This topic doesn't look like popular :)
>
> Should we consider this silence as a "no go"?
Since there is absolutely no negative or mitigated (+/-0) vote, it is difficult
to interpret this vote as failed. I'll keep the vote open for more
Nicolas, thanks. I was one class off. I was looking at Main and AntMain
when I should have been looking at Launcher. Seeing the type names and the
main method threw me off. And this corroborates my brief follow-up that I
could be doing something with URLClassLoader. Better for me to try to
leverage
Hi Mitch,
Le 21 juil. 2012 à 07:37, Mitch Gitman a écrit :
> Technically, this message is better suited for the ant-user list, but I'm
> thinking I'm more apt to get an answer on this list. (I'm also thinking
> this is the better place for me to cash in some chits for my having
> submitted patche
