On 2011-02-25, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Following up on a thread on gump mailing list. [1]
> The change that you mentioned in your earlier email is likely this one [2]:
> r1061156 | bodewig | 2011-01-20 03:25:35 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2011) | 1 line
> Give build.sysclasspath a chance to influenc
Je serai absent(e) du 2011-02-25 au 2011-03-08.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour.
Pour toutes urgences, rejoindre Daniel Leclerc (7473)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional comman
Hello Antoine ,
Thank you , I will start working on it asap .
Regards ,
Gaurav
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Hello Gaurav,
>
> Welcome
>
> you can download the sources of ant from subversion [1] to read the code,
> read the sources
> in your favorite developme
Stefan,
Following up on a thread on gump mailing list. [1]
The change that you mentioned in your earlier email is likely this one [2]:
r1061156 | bodewig | 2011-01-20 03:25:35 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2011) | 1 line
Give build.sysclasspath a chance to influence a forked VM's
bootclasspath even if the
Hello Gaurav,
Welcome
you can download the sources of ant from subversion [1] to read the
code, read the sources
in your favorite development environment, and read the discussions on
the dev and on the user lists.
As I was suggesting you can look at bugzilla and see whether there are
bug r
On 2/24/2011 8:24 PM, rukhsana afroz wrote:
Hi Antonie,
i have found your bugzilla. Once I have question about the bug, I will get
back to you.
Thanks
Ruby
Sounds good. We have a channel #apache-ant-dev on irc.freenode.net. I am
not always there though.
Regards,
Antoine
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011
Hi,
>> I tried to introduce some micro-optimizations
>> (pretty much like these) into the Tomcat codebase 8 years ago, but was
>> met with 'meh why bother?' responses as the thinking was that the vm
>> would pretty much make optimizations pointless. I suppose it depends
>> on where the hotspots a
>> I guess this brings up a bigger issue (again) which is when will we
>> modernize Ant?
>
> Oh, we just did. Ant 1.8.x dropped Java 1.3 ;-)
>
> It's been our community that didn't want to take a bigger step forward.
We're l33t bleeding edge here :)
So I guess the next optimization task for us n
Hi,
>> Interesting discussion - I tried to introduce some micro-optimizations
>> (pretty much like these) into the Tomcat codebase 8 years ago, but was
>> met with 'meh why bother?' responses as the thinking was that the vm
>> would pretty much make optimizations pointless. I suppose it depends
>
