On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Danny Yates wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer ref
>
> I'm not sure that merging the two builds is possible for various reasons.
> Technically, yes; but for "security reasons", no.
>
> Also, I'd really like it so that I don't have to (or or
> or whetever) into the
Thanks for the pointer ref
I'm not sure that merging the two builds is possible for various reasons.
Technically, yes; but for "security reasons", no.
Also, I'd really like it so that I don't have to (or or
or whetever) into the service-specific scripts, because there are
(will be) a large nu
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Danny Yates wrote:
> [...]
> In essence, you describe the build file which uses "extensionOf"
> importing/including the build file which has the extension-points, but we're
> trying to work the other way around and throwing two "master" build files
> into the mix!
So, we have two top-level Ant scripts: build.xml and deploy.xml. Our system
consists of a number of services and, right now, details of how to build,
package, deploy and start those services is scattered around these files
(and a handful of include/macro files too) which makes adding new services
a
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I've taken your patch and modified it locally so the attribute is now
> named onMissingExtensionPoint (and the value "error" has been renamed to
> "fail"). I've also added constants for the three possible attribute
> values to ProjectHelper
On 2010-06-23, Danny Yates wrote:
> I take it this will be in 1.8.2 then?
Yes.
> Is there a schedule for release?
Not even a tentative one so far.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
That's awesome. Thanks Stefan.
I take it this will be in 1.8.2 then? Is there a schedule for release?
On 23 June 2010 11:34, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-06-22, Danny Yates wrote:
>
> > OK, so no feedback. Consider this to be me nagging :-)
>
> Consider me nagged.
>
> I've taken your patch
On 2010-06-22, Danny Yates wrote:
> OK, so no feedback. Consider this to be me nagging :-)
Consider me nagged.
I've taken your patch and modified it locally so the attribute is now
named onMissingExtensionPoint (and the value "error" has been renamed to
"fail"). I've also added constants for th
