Hello Matt,
Matt Benson wrote:
> FWIW, however, I have found Brian Fox to be quite knowledgeable on
> Maven matters (not unexpectedly). If he says it works, it probably
> does.
I am a bit paranoid, I just checked that it really works, and yes, I can
add a dependency to org.apache.ant, ant, 1.8.0
FWIW, however, I have found Brian Fox to be quite knowledgeable on
Maven matters (not unexpectedly). If he says it works, it probably
does. I am pretty sure that in Ivy's case if the metadata were not
found it would fall back to simply mining the expected locations for
the artifacts based on the
--hence my declaration of being less than sure. You are correct. I
have no idea then! :)
-Matt
On 5/24/10, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Hello Matt,
>
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:58:06 -0500
>> Von: Matt Benson
>> An: Ant Developers List
>> Betreff
Hello Matt,
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:58:06 -0500
> Von: Matt Benson
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE-RESULTS] use nexus for maven upload of ant release
> Antoine: I'm not sure about this, but it may be that the
> maven-metadata shows that
Antoine: I'm not sure about this, but it may be that the
maven-metadata shows that 1.8.1 is the only version managed through
the Apache Nexus install, but when 1.8.1 propagates out to maven
central, the earlier versions as well as 1.8.1 will be represented in
that metadata.
-Matt
On 5/24/10, Ant
On 05/24/2010 08:18 AM, Gilles Scokart wrote:
Maybe an intermediary solution would be to have 2 source directories. One
for all core classes and tasks, and a second one regrouping all optional
tasks.
I don't see any advantage to that - you no longer have a single source tree,
yet you still ne
Hi,
I have succeeded to upload ant 1.8.1 using nexus. [1]
Thanks Maarten for your help.
There is an issue though that the maven-metadata.xml files such as [2] now are
mentioning only the 1.8.1 version of ant. Brian Fox says that this does not
affect the usability of these versions (1.7.0, 1.7.
Jesse didn't closed the vote yet, but there is quiet a lot of 50/50 on the
first question.
Maybe an intermediary solution would be to have 2 source directories. One
for all core classes and tasks, and a second one regrouping all optional
tasks.
Gilles Scokart
On 24 May 2010 12:08, Kevin Jacks
Hi,
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split
> into subtrees?
>
> [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to
> conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs.
>
> [ ] Yes, split
