Re: includeantruntime warning (was: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1)

Just did not like the presence of the warning,since it will hit nearly every ant build file out there. Still it is in ant 1.8.0 so no need to change it now. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> I am not too sure that I like the warning: >> >> 'inc

Re: includeantruntime warning (was: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1)

Peter Reilly wrote: I am not too sure that I like the warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds You don't like the text of the warning message, or the fact that there is a warning at all? I have just seen a lot of bui

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

ok, scratch that, the warning happens for ant 1.8.0 as well :-( So +1 for the 1.8.1 release. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: > I am not too sure that I like the warning: > > /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: > 'includeantruntime' was not set, defa

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

I am not too sure that I like the warning: /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds when using without setting the includeantruntime attribute. (not too sure if this was added

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

+1 no issue here with easyant Regards, 2010/5/1 Antoine Levy-Lambert > Hi, > > I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under > http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ > > Also a label ANT_181 has been created in the repository. > > Vote to release th

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

On 4-5-2010 14:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 [X] Yes [ ] No +1 martijn No problems observed - To unsubscribe