Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-02-26, Simone Cato wrote:
Is this the intended effect of multiple s within the same scope?
Probably not a conscious choice.
You've just created a new local binding for the name "who", destroying
the old local binding.
I agree, datatypes are mutable, properties are not, why add this complexity
of "final".
Peter
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that ant datatypes are currently de-facto mutable by default.
> Maybe we are making this too complex.
> Of course, o
