On 2010-02-05, Mohammed Aziz Parande wrote:
> I am a graduate student in the Department of Information Systems at the
> University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). I am doing research in the
> area of software engineering. I would very much appreciate if you could
> answer the following ques
hi
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Mohammed Aziz Parande wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am a graduate student in the Department of Information Systems at the
> University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). I am doing research in the
> area of software engineering. I would very much appreciate if you c
Hi,
I am a graduate student in the Department of Information Systems at the
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). I am doing research in the
area of software engineering. I would very much appreciate if you could
answer the following questions of mine:
1. I was wondering if ANT h
Some little notes about that last release:
* in the tag, the svn:external to xooki was not changed to a fixed revision (it
is in the release doc just after tagging the release branch)
* in the staging updatesite there was Ivy 2.1, IvyDE 2.0 and IvyDE 2.1, but not
Ivy 2.0 (the point of IVYDE-185 w
Well, yee-haw then. :P
On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Jon Schneider wrote:
Please do. I think it would be advantageous to build the final
IvyDE 2.1.0
with this fix as well.
Jon
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Matt Benson
wrote:
Okay, all the silly questions notwithstanding, I was act
Please do. I think it would be advantageous to build the final IvyDE 2.1.0
with this fix as well.
Jon
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Okay, all the silly questions notwithstanding, I was actually able to
> muddle through this. ;) As it turns out, the Pulse-managed Eclip
Okay, all the silly questions notwithstanding, I was actually able to
muddle through this. ;) As it turns out, the Pulse-managed Eclipse
installations I've been using, even after adding Eclipse plugin
development plugins, are apparently not suitable as baseLocations for
the updatesite's b
The RC was just a guess on my part. If we are going straight to a final
version, I'll rebuild and update my staging site.
Jon
2010/2/4 Nicolas Lalevée
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:24:22 -0600, Jon Schneider
> wrote:
> > It is meant to be an RC1.
>
> I am a bit confused too. We didn't talked about
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:24:22 -0600, Jon Schneider
wrote:
> It is meant to be an RC1.
I am a bit confused too. We didn't talked about doing a RC, just a 2.1.0,
a final one.
Do you want to do an RC ? I am confident in the stability of the current
code, I am fine with going out without RC. And if the
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:38:45 -0800 (PST), Maarten Coene
wrote:
> Jon,
>
> I'm a bit confused. Did you build a IvyDE 2.1.0-RC1, or did you build
> IvyDE 2.1.0 final?
>
> I have some questions/remarks:
> - the binary distribution files don't have a seperate doc folder (like
the
> ivyde-2.0 binary d
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:52:39 -0500, Antoine Levy Lambert
wrote:
> Jon Schneider wrote:
>>
>> I've signed the artifacts, but seeing as I'm kind of new here, nobody
>> else
>> has signed my key.
> I am not totally new but also my key is not signed by anybody
Me neither.
I did get a warning though
11 matches
Mail list logo