On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>[junit] Testcase:
> testSymbolicLinkUtilsMethods(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix.SymlinkTest):
> FAILED
I've never seen that, which OS?
> [au:antunit] Target: testTraceJdk15+ FAILED
Which build file is that?
> I know that the junit
Hi,
I found 5 failing test cases in the build of ant 1.8.0RC1.
[junit] Testcase:
testGetResourcesUsingFactory(org.apache.tools.ant.loader.AntClassLoader5Test):
FAILED
[junit] Test org.apache.tools.ant.loader.AntClassLoader5Test FAILED
[junit] Testcase:
testRedirector13(org.apache
Hi,
I have just done a build of ant 1.8.0RC1. The tag in svn is ANT_180_RC1.
The build can be downloaded from
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/ for evaluation.
The tentative release date for this build is January 12 th 2010.
Vote
[ ] release this build as ant 1.8.0
Hi,
does someone know how the build of ant in hudson is setup ?
I have seen this notification [1]:
/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Ant (JDK 1.4)/trunk/build.xml:1024: The
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Ant (JDK 1.4)/trunk/build.xml:
Hi,
>> + throw new BuildException("The repository [ "+
>> getGitRepo()+ " ] specified is not recognised");
>> + }
>
> A UK spelling of recognised is just going to lead to more bugreps, we need a
> phrase that is more locale-neutral
fair cop,
Any suggested alter
Hello Steve,
there will be for sure several release candidates. And afterwards
several 1.8.x builds.
Regards,
Antoine
Steve Loughran wrote:
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I am thinking of building the first ant 1.8.0 release candidate
tomorrow.
I need to get my docs together; won't be abl
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I am thinking of building the first ant 1.8.0 release candidate tomorrow.
I need to get my docs together; won't be able to do it today
in EU working hours. what is the timetable for getting doc patches into
the release chain?
k...@apache.org wrote:
+ throw new BuildException("The repository [ "+ getGitRepo()+
" ] specified is not recognised");
+ }
A UK spelling of recognised is just going to lead to more bugreps, we
need a phrase that is more locale-neutral
--
