The Incubator IP-CLEARANCE process has entered its final stage, I've
notified the incubator general list and if things go well Nicolas can
commit the code to the sandbox early next week.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
On 2009-12-11, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> But before I start doing this: do we want to accept the donation?
Yes, we do. The vote has passed with +1s from seven PMC members and no
other votes.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:42:11 +0100, Stefan Bodewig
wrote:
> On 2009-12-16, Bruce Atherton wrote:
>
>> To me, only two of the options are seriously being discussed right now:
>
>> 1) the current target-group codebase
>> 2) moving the behaviour of target-group into all targets through a
>>
Hello Stefan,
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-12-16, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>
>
>> Bruce Atherton wrote:
>>
>>> I think that would be very confusing at this point.
>>>
>
>
>> If most people in the ant community, especially committers, think that
>> this idea breaks the phil
On 2009-12-16, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> Bruce Atherton wrote:
>> I think that would be very confusing at this point.
> If most people in the ant community, especially committers, think that
> this idea breaks the philosophy of ant, then it should not be
> developed.
It may be confusing to
On 2009-12-17, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> You've convinced me. Just because we can't think of a problem doesn't
> mean that one doesn't exist, and it is a little late in the day to
> start monkeying around if we want to get a new release out the door.
> So Stefan, as far as your poll is concerned,
On 2009-12-16, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Sorry to hijack your POLL thread Stefan ;)
Thank you for doing so
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.
On 2009-12-16, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> To me, only two of the options are seriously being discussed right now:
> 1) the current target-group codebase
> 2) moving the behaviour of target-group into all targets through a
> marker attribute
Nobody is more surprised by this then myself. Nico
