Sorry if the previous thread was hijacked by naming issues, but I'm not
sure I'm ready to vote in a poll yet.
To me, only two of the options are seriously being discussed right now:
1) the current target-group codebase
2) moving the behaviour of target-group into all targets through a
marker
I think that would be very confusing at this point. For better or worse,
Ant was designed from the beginning to build its dependencies through
backwards chaining. It is often (usually) surprising behaviour to the
first time user, but once learned quickly becomes second nature.
Introducing a new
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2009-12-14, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I have never thought about how this could be implemented and how much
work it is. It is probably a non-trivial addition because it means
that the list of targets to execute and their order will change
dynamically during the bu
On 2009-12-15, vino_hymi wrote:
> I am running taskdef ant task. But i get the below error and says build
> failed.
please use the u...@ant list for user questions, this list is for the
development of Ant itself.
The error message you see says there is a problem with the task
BuildEarTask
> B
Hi,
I am running taskdef ant task. But i get the below error and says build
failed.
BUILD FAILED
/u/tibco/Builds/build.xml:36: java.lang.IllegalThreadStateException: process
hasn't exited
at BuildEarTask.execute(BuildEarTask.java:41)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execut
