Performance of Ant Move

2009-09-25 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
Hi, We are observing ant move is way too much time for directory renaming with contents more than 100mb. How efficient is move for rename of directory names with the same parent. Regards, Raja Nagendra Kumar, C.T.O www.tejasoft.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Perfor

Re: SubAnt performance

2009-09-25 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
>Then I'd think subant is the wrong task in that context. I don't > understand why you'd be calling subant "on yourself" anyway. we have a target like 'clean' which deletes current directories 'build' folder and calls all the sub directories clean target. The sub directories build build file cal

Re: if/unless Attributes

2009-09-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-09-25, Jesse Glick wrote: > Refined proposal: > 1. Make evaluate if/unless attributes (just before deciding > whether or not to run the target). it already does (and has done so in the past). > 2. Introduce Project.isTrueOrSet(String val) which would return true > if toBoolean(val) ||

Re: if/unless Attributes

2009-09-25 Thread Matt Benson
--- On Fri, 9/25/09, Dominique Devienne wrote: > From: Dominique Devienne > Subject: Re: if/unless Attributes > To: "Ant Developers List" > Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 9:31 AM > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, > Jesse Glick > wrote: > > Refined proposal: > > > > 1. Make evaluate if/u

Re: if/unless Attributes

2009-09-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Refined proposal: > > 1. Make evaluate if/unless attributes (just before deciding whether > or not to run the target). > > 2. Introduce Project.isTrueOrSet(String val) which would return true if > toBoolean(val) || getProperty(val) != null. >

Re: if/unless Attributes

2009-09-25 Thread Jesse Glick
Stefan Bodewig wrote: A modest suggestion: why don't we just make PropertyHelper treat (String) "false" as (Boolean) false, and likewise? I wouldn't do that in PropertyHelper Sorry, what I wrote did not make sense. but would think it may be a sensible choice for target. What I meant was

Re: SubAnt performance

2009-09-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-09-25, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: >> isolation between the calling and thecalled project. > stefan, it is true of inherit* properties, however here are some > scenarios Then I'd think subant is the wrong task in that context. I don't understand why you'd be calling subant "on yourself"