AW: 1.8.0 Bugzilla Milestone Reached

>> So is it true that JDK 1.4 is the minimum platform for 1.8.0? > >WHATSNEW in trunk says so, as does >. Sounds offical ;-) > >> If so, I've got a list of little cleanups that could be made to drop >> code & docs dealing with earlier versions. > >I've

Re: 1.8.0 Bugzilla Milestone Reached

On 2009-08-26, Jesse Glick wrote: > So is it true that JDK 1.4 is the minimum platform for 1.8.0? WHATSNEW in trunk says so, as does . Sounds offical ;-) > If so, I've got a list of little cleanups that could be made to drop > code & docs dealing wi

Re: 1.8.0 Bugzilla Milestone Reached

So is it true that JDK 1.4 is the minimum platform for 1.8.0? If so, I've got a list of little cleanups that could be made to drop code & docs dealing with earlier versions. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache

Re: pom2ivy and transitive source retrieving

2009/8/24 Nicolas Lalevée > A point raised by a user of Ivy: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-ivy-user/200908.mbox/%3ca0b0f63671be56498793255905162b5db2e...@dc1.fal.local%3e > Which also point to these > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-325 > https://issues.apache.org/jir

Re: Any Unfinished Experiments in trunk?

On 2009-08-24, Gilles Scokart wrote: > There is one from an older release. The coreLoader : Yes, but trunk isn't really different from 1.7.1 so it doesn't need any special handling. > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522 If even Peter doesn't commit the patch himself, I wo