2009/4/9 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2009-03-24, Maxim Kizub wrote:
>
>> 1. What do you think about the idea of writing such Ant IDE?
>
> Sounds interesting but I know that at least I wouldn't have enough
> cycles to contribute.
This is not going to be the IDE written from scratch. It's just a
plugin t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Eger, Patrick wrote:
> Hi, recently was working with some build scripts and found a deficiency in
> the “Sync” task, namely that it cannot actually compare file content and
> instead works strictly off file date. This was not usable for us and so I
> implemented th
On 2009-04-09, Martin von Gagern wrote:
> This is the mailing list inbcarnation of bug 47002.
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002
Thanks!
I haven't found the time to look into your patch, yet. In general it
is enough to send the patch to one place and bugzilla is the bet
Hi Patrick
On 2009-03-24, Eger, Patrick wrote:
Unfortunately the mailing list manager has eaten your attachment. The
best approach is to open a bugzilla enhancement request and attach it
there.
> Hi, recently was working with some build scripts and found a deficiency
> in the "Sync" task, name
On 2009-03-24, Maxim Kizub wrote:
> 1. What do you think about the idea of writing such Ant IDE?
Sounds interesting but I know that at least I wouldn't have enough
cycles to contribute.
> 2. If you'll find it convenient enough - will you distribute it
> together with Ant?
Probably not with the
On 2009-03-24, Kronus David wrote:
> I've implemented this in a way that is probably not compatible with
> Ant policy, namely that the code has to compile on Java 1.2, or am I
> wrong?
Java 1.4 for trunk. And this is only true for core tasks, optional
tasks can set the barrier as high as they l
On 2009-03-11, Samir SAADA wrote:
> I have noticed a version confusion in documentation, for a sync task
> nested element. The task sync exists since the 1.6.0; but
> preserveInTarget element appeared in the 1.7.0 version of ant.
Thanks. Fixed in svn with revision 763656.
Stefan
Martin von Gagern wrote:
> This is the mailing list inbcarnation of bug 47002.
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002
>
> [...]
>
> Please review,
> Martin von Gagern
I forgot to attach the patch. Doing so now.
Expose classpath and factory of internal XSLTProcess task.
http
Hi!
This is the mailing list inbcarnation of bug 47002.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002
junitreport does create an internal xslt task to format its report. It
doesn't expose most of the configuration options of that task, though.
In particular, it does not allow the class
No ideas? :'(
2009/4/6 Jean-Louis BOUDART
> Hi there,
>
> I have a few questions on ant-core.
>
> *How to extends the main class?*
> I would like to extends the main class to deal with new command line
> parameters for EasyAnt, and have a custom project help.
>
> I must create a new class that i
10 matches
Mail list logo