Re: [FWD] Bugzilla upgrade and proposed change to workflow

2009-02-20 Thread Bruce Atherton
Since the workflow is now configurable, presumably that means that we can define new states. If so, why couldn't we create our own state (WORKINGON or something) to indicate that someone is tackling the bug without changing the email address? Could we ask the admin to change all assigned to a

Manage compile errors in

2009-02-20 Thread Furingstad
Hi We are creating a CI process for a large java projects with an estimated 15-20-thousand java object. It is crucial for the process that we find and report all Compile errors at each build, the problem is that we cant figure this out with ANT's javac task as we cant catch each error without sto

Re: [FWD] Bugzilla upgrade and proposed change to workflow

2009-02-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-20, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > From our nice Bugzilla admin: >> I would like to go further and remove the ASSIGNED status >> completely. If this will cause your project any issues, please let >> bugzilla-admin know. I will notify them about our discussion and follow up after we've come

Re: [FWD] Bugzilla upgrade and proposed change to workflow

2009-02-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-20, wrote: > Another discussion could be migrating to Jira. Yes, a completely different discussion. > BTW where can I see the defined workflows in BugZilla + Jira? No idea, sorry. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

2009-02-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-20, Jesse Glick wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: Do you know whether a Java 1.4 VM will even try to load the class file under any circumstances (other than some explicit reflection invocations)? >>> You cannot use package-info.java with JDK 1.4 to begin with. >> I know t