Re: target-group committed

2008-11-26 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Bruce Atherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or you could just live with the verbosity of the target list, like I did, > and use naming conventions in EasyAnt. I'm sure there are many other ways to > address the issue. One possible way would be to provide an in-buil

Re: target-group committed

2008-11-26 Thread Bruce Atherton
Right. I see a "part-of" relationship of arbitrary depth as being best implemented using a Composite design pattern. A target-group is a composite for targets but is itself also a target. The level idea was only an example off the top of my head, but in thinking about it you are right that num

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

2008-11-26 Thread Gilles Scokart
2008/11/26 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-11-26, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on >> cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always >> failing. > >> Did others have the problem? > > Never

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

2008-11-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2008-11-26, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on > cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always > failing. > Did others have the problem? Never, neither on Windows/Cygwin nor on Linux. BTW, I thought

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

2008-11-26 Thread Gilles Scokart
I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always failing. Did others have the problem? I already had some file-system issues on my machines when deleting files, (the delete of freshly created files were sometime fail

Re: target-group committed

2008-11-26 Thread Gilles Scokart
I was asking to myself the same question : why only 2 levels? I think you are right, we don't need different type of targets, what we should have is a new type of relationship between targets : the PartOf relationship that allow to plug a 'lower' level target INTO an other target. But for the idea