BTW, here is the output from ant -diagnostics. As I mentioned before,
I do have the class
(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.CachingTraXLiaison) that is
not being found in the ant-nodeps.jar (I even unzipped it to check).
I modified the org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess to choo
Hi,
I am trying to test out the caching for the xslt task, but running
into some basic problem. I have built ant to include my code changes
and additions. But, I am getting a class not found exception. The ant-
nodeps.jar in the dist/lib dir contains the class that is not being
found. I do
Hi,
Is it possible to resolve a property name like this
${${prefix}.someproperty}
making the prefix variable?
Cheers,
Remie
2008/10/31 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2008/10/30 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>public void hello() {
>>>TagBuilder.forProject(p)
>>>.newTag("echo")
>>>.withAttribute("message"
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
This is not that much based on features available (although I consider
using NIO in StreamPumper) but more on "where do we test".
The vote is simple. If you vote +1 then we make 1.4 the minimum
requirement, if you vote -1 it will stay at 1.3. This is a code
change and thu
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/30 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>public void hello() {
>>TagBuilder.forProject(p)
>>.newTag("echo")
>>.withAttribute("message", "Hello, ${world}!")
>>.execute();
>>}
2008/10/30 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is not that much based on features available (although I consider
> using NIO in StreamPumper) but more on "where do we test".
>
> The vote is simple. If you vote +1 then we make 1.4 the minimum
> requirement, if you vote -1 it will stay at 1.3
2008/10/30 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>public void hello() {
>TagBuilder.forProject(p)
>.newTag("echo")
>.withAttribute("message", "Hello, ${world}!")
>.execute();
>}
Some alternatives :
public void hello() {
EchoTask echo = TagB
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doubting if it is a good idea for 1.7.x if we would make another
> one.
So far nobody seemed to want another 1.7.x release.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
+1 for 1.8 / main
doubting if it is a good idea for 1.7.x if we would make another one.
Martijn
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
This is not that much based on features available (although I consider
using NIO in StreamPumper) but more on "where do we test".
The vote is simple. If you vote +1 then we
10 matches
Mail list logo
