AW: FYI: Ant listed as "defect free"

2008-10-08 Thread Jan.Materne
>Maybe the 'old path' is the better one ATM. >I could use a > >for ensure that the user had done that. (Maybe I was happy about the >success with Ivy+Checkstyle ...) As Xavier does an "init-ivy" if implemented an "init-findbugs": download Findbugs and set its home. >>> - FB run throws error

Build failed on CI server

2008-10-08 Thread Jan.Materne
Linux: http://teamcity.jetbrains.com/viewLog.html;jsessionid=B2FCF7E3EAB6A4B0CD 46200A14A00579?tab=buildLog&buildTypeId=bt134&buildId=14460&all=true [19:39:16]: Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.util.VectorSetTest [19:39:16]: Tests run: 20, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec [19:39:16]:

AW: FYI: Ant listed as "defect free"

2008-10-08 Thread Jan.Materne
>> - downloading Findbugs works - but only for an old version (1.0.0 >> instead of 1.3.5) > >downloading via Ivy you mean? When I was younger, we simply went to >the project's download page and manually added the jars to the >directories we wanted them to live in. I've been told that still >works

Re: FYI: Ant listed as "defect free"

2008-10-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. But it is not so important what other say if you cant recheck > it (IMHO). Agreed. > So I tried to set up a Findbug run in check.xml. +1 > But I got a problem: > > - downloading Findbugs works - but only for an old version (1.0.

AW: FYI: Ant listed as "defect free"

2008-10-08 Thread Jan.Materne
Yes. But it is not so important what other say if you cant recheck it (IMHO). So I tried to set up a Findbug run in check.xml. But I got a problem: - downloading Findbugs works - but only for an old version (1.0.0 instead of 1.3.5) - FB run throws errors I dont understand [fb:findbugs] Running F