AW: How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Jan.Materne
Homepage of CC http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ List of recommend readings http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/gettingstartedbindist.html#Where_to_go_Next After a quick look I recommend of these http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/Getting+Started+With+CruiseControl Contin

Re: How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Jan K
Hi, I have downloaded the cruisecontrol.I have cvs.Can you let me know what should i do next or can you give me any documentation on it.Please guide me. Thorsten Scherler-3 wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 02:40 -0700, Jan K wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am new to apache ant.I just know for what purp

Re: Allowing antlibs to contribute diagnostics & version info

2008-09-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Jeffrey E. Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/28/2008 11:28:40 AM: > >> OK. Maybe the antlib would just point to the antlib.xml file(s) >> there and we add the description and versioning stuff into the >> antlib descriptor? > > I

Re: Allowing antlibs to contribute diagnostics & version info

2008-09-01 Thread Jeffrey E Care
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/28/2008 11:28:40 AM: > OK. Maybe the antlib would just point to the antlib.xml file(s) there > and we add the description and versioning stuff into the antlib > descriptor? I think you meant that the service file would point to the antlib.xml? The

Re: Allowing antlibs to contribute diagnostics & version info

2008-09-01 Thread Jeffrey E Care
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/01/2008 11:00:55 AM: > On Mon, 01 Sep 2008, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You could also run through all antlibs defined in the root of the > > project, list which are there and diagnose them. Since they are the > > ones that matter

Re: Allowing antlibs to contribute diagnostics & version info

2008-09-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could also run through all antlibs defined in the root of the > project, list which are there and diagnose them. Since they are the > ones that matter if they are missing... I think there is a good case for a "ant -version -v" l

Re: Allowing antlibs to contribute diagnostics & version info

2008-09-01 Thread Steve Loughran
Jeffrey E Care wrote: I haven't looked at the code in question, but I would think the hardest part of this whole effort would be providing the means for Ant to look up antlib version info. I'm actually fairly enthusiastic about using the combination of existing arguments, mostly just because of

Re: File Name wiht NLS Special Characters

2008-09-01 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Folks, I'm trying to run the Jax-ws APT ant task on file with a NLS name: S_BASIC_ÃÑÑÖÏÑG_Bean.java I don't think you are asking on the correct list. There may be people on the user list who use the same task (I don't ev

Re: Anybody familiar with ChoiceFormat? Issue 44659

2008-09-01 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looking back at this again, I think having the number formatted according to the US Locale would be more confusing than by the default Locale, speaking without the perspective of a person who typically uses e.g. .

Re: How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 03:17 -0700, Jan K wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for your quick response.I dont know any of these stuffs.Can you > please elaborate me in more so that it will be of a great help.Can you > please put in points as what should i do and how it can be done.Looking > forward for your reply.

Re: OSGi friendly LatestRevisionStrategy patch

2008-09-01 Thread Alex Radeski
On 9/1/08, Tony Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For example, from the LatestRevisionStrategyTest.testComparator() > > test, the natural order of both OSGi and non-OSGi versions is: > > 0.2a, 0.2_b, 0.2rc1, 0.2-final, 1.0-dev1, 1.0-dev2, 1.0-alpha1, > > 1.0-alpha2, 1.0-beta1, 1.0-beta2, 1.0-

Re: How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Jan K
Hi, Thanks for your quick response.I dont know any of these stuffs.Can you please elaborate me in more so that it will be of a great help.Can you please put in points as what should i do and how it can be done.Looking forward for your reply. Thorsten Scherler-3 wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at

Re: How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 12:06 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 02:40 -0700, Jan K wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am new to apache ant.I just know for what purpose we use ant.Now i need > > to > > automize my project with ant.My requirement is Whenever i checkin my > > code,the bui

Re: How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 02:40 -0700, Jan K wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to apache ant.I just know for what purpose we use ant.Now i need to > automize my project with ant.My requirement is Whenever i checkin my > code,the build and deploy should be done automatically. Well there are a couple of our

How to automize Ant

2008-09-01 Thread Jan K
Hi, I am new to apache ant.I just know for what purpose we use ant.Now i need to automize my project with ant.My requirement is Whenever i checkin my code,the build and deploy should be done automatically.Also a notification should be send to QA team.Also the build and deploy should be carried

Re: OSGi friendly LatestRevisionStrategy patch

2008-09-01 Thread Tony Sweeney
On Aug 31, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Alex Radeski wrote: Hi, While working on the Bushel project (http://code.google.com/p/bushel/) to add OSGi bundle support to Ivy, I stumbled across a limitation in the LatestRevisionStrategy. The current implementation sorts OSGi major.minor.micro[.qualifier] in wh

Re: OSGi friendly LatestRevisionStrategy patch

2008-09-01 Thread Alex Radeski
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Xavier, > While I understand the your point of view, the change you request may imply > breaking versionning strategies for people using for years. Hence I'm not in > favor of changing this, at least we need to provide an