Re: Retry task container

2007-05-12 Thread Paul King
There is one of these in WebTest: http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/retry.html But it might be nice to have one outside WebTest as well. You might want to guard against NoRetries being equal to 0 or change the code to skip the perform in that case. It wouldn't be the usual case but migh

Retry task container

2007-05-12 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi all, Looking through the bugzilla I came across, #28736 requesting a retry attribute for the ftp task. I thought instead that a generic Retry task container may be useful. I've quickly thrown this together and first tests (using get) seem to be fine, does anyone have an objection to adding th

svn commit: r537549 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/antlib.xml

2007-05-12 Thread kevj
Author: kevj Date: Sat May 12 21:07:41 2007 New Revision: 537549 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=537549 Log: -resource may not be a file Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/antlib.xml Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/a

Re: svn commit: r537344 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ResourceContains.java

2007-05-12 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi Steve, Not sure about this. Why take a string? Its not being resolved relative to the project base, and is doing work that ant should do. This is why I wanted someone to check over my resource stuff as I wasn't sure it was correct. If we want to look in a resource for a string -the test

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

2007-05-12 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2007-05-12 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

svn commit: r537505 - /ant/core/trunk/KEYS

2007-05-12 Thread bodewig
Author: bodewig Date: Sat May 12 12:53:08 2007 New Revision: 537505 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=537505 Log: new signatures Modified: ant/core/trunk/KEYS Modified: ant/core/trunk/KEYS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/KEYS?view=diff&rev=537505&r1=537504&r2=5

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2007-05-12 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

RE: Antunit timings inaccurate?

2007-05-12 Thread Stephen McConnell
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2007 3:08 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Antunit timings inaccurate? > > Hi all, > > Just writing some antunit tests for a new condition and got > this in the output: > > [antuni

Re: svn commit: r537344 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ResourceContains.java

2007-05-12 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevj Date: Fri May 11 23:09:06 2007 New Revision: 537344 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=537344 Log: -new ResourceContains condition Added: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ResourceContains.java Added: ant/cor

Re: debian packaging related tasks - sandboxable?

2007-05-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would this be suitable for the svn sandbox? Absolutely yes. > Are there any objections to my committing my progress so far? Go ahead. The sandbox is there for committers to play. Stefan --