Re: DSL

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All right... maybe I _am_ ready to prototype this > > thing (see the userlist if you're not up to > speed). > > Will need to do my reading later, but ... > > > So what's the deal w

Re: DSL

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All right... maybe I _am_ ready to prototype this > thing (see the userlist if you're not up to speed). Will need to do my reading later, but ... > So what's the deal with starting a sandbox Antlib? Just do. And please update the xdo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41559] New: - JUnitReport - An option to disable the number in the report file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DSL

Matt Benson wrote: All right... maybe I _am_ ready to prototype this thing (see the userlist if you're not up to speed). I finally came up with a name I like, so maybe that's a sign. So what's the deal with starting a sandbox Antlib? Do I need 3 committers when I write the proposal, or later i

DSL

All right... maybe I _am_ ready to prototype this thing (see the userlist if you're not up to speed). I finally came up with a name I like, so maybe that's a sign. So what's the deal with starting a sandbox Antlib? Do I need 3 committers when I write the proposal, or later if/when it's ready for

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

per-task diagnostics

I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, by moving more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could have a diagnostics(PrintStream) method that would be called to do the diags. With this the -diagnostics routine could run through all tasks that it knows about,

Re: Nightlies

Hi Peter, it is impossible to connect to vmbuild.apache.org, the server where the nightlies are supposed to run. I mailed Phil Steitz who contacted Henri Yandell. Antoine On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: On 2/6/07, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Uhhm ... it

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: Nightlies

On 2/6/07, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Uhhm ... it looks like our nightlies do not even run every night, It is worse that than than. The nightlies do not seem to do an svn update. On checking the content (specifically WHATSNEW) it seems that the content is somewhere between