svn commit: r481484 - /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms/ant/pom.xml

Author: kevj Date: Fri Dec 1 17:34:28 2006 New Revision: 481484 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481484 Log: - remove wrong comment Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms/ant/pom.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms/ant/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41058] - [PATCH] Support JDK 5 enumerations for attribute values

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r481329 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/develop.html

Author: jglick Date: Fri Dec 1 10:10:20 2006 New Revision: 481329 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481329 Log: Forgot to document #41058! Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/develop.html Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/develop.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/

Two good patches for mysql support and generic sql row counting

I submitted two patches a month ago and I would like to know if any of the developers wouldnt mind adding it to a forthcoming release. One of the patches returns the count of the result rows in an efficient manner. The other adds support for mysql which is especially useful when sourcing mysqldum

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41058] - [PATCH] Support JDK 5 enumerations for attribute values

Committed. Steve Loughran wrote: the only thing I see this breaking is any class which has a java5 enum of a specific name, and a legacy enum with the same name. You can't; enums and classes use the same namespace. Or maybe I'm missing your point. you end up writing tasks that are java5+ o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41058] - [PATCH] Support JDK 5 enumerations for attribute values

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r481322 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/IntrospectionHelper.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/AntStructure.java

Author: jglick Date: Fri Dec 1 09:50:46 2006 New Revision: 481322 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481322 Log: #41058: permit Java 5 enumerations to work like EnumeratedAttribute. Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/IntrospectionHe

svn commit: r481253 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/projects.html xdocs/projects.xml

Author: jhm Date: Fri Dec 1 06:49:15 2006 New Revision: 481253 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481253 Log: Add Leafcutter. Minor codestyle. Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/projects.html ant/core/trunk/xdocs/projects.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/projects.html URL: http

Re: ConditionBase.java patch for supporting description attribute

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Any opinions on pushing the descriptin attribute from Task to ProjectComponent? +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: javax scripting for ant 1.7.0

Hi all, Having just got back from hols and getting up to speed on this, my initial thoughts are -1 for including this in 1.7.0, given that we are in the release candidate stage and Antoine wants to do the full release in 9 days. I know it's bad form to veto when I may not be 100% sure of all the

Re: mapper refid

On 12/1/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently, > > > > > doesn't work, because expects its refid > always to point to a . Should the above > example work? Yes, I think it should. Me too. > Further, should(n't)

Re: .ant/lib at project level

On 12/1/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I then had a brainwave, why not have a .ant/lib directory > in the project directory (defined as the directory > that contains the build file). I can see how this would be useful

AW: build date for Ant 1.7.0

>Here are alternative notations, for example: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==> too email like >javax/javascript >javascript[javax] >javax+javascript >etc... > >Actually, I kinda like the javax+javascript one. As I've >written a few times, as the _talker_ rather than the _doer_, I >wouldn't -1 the javax:jav