DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40847] - Possible NullPointerException in Jar.createIndexList()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40847] New: - Possible NullPointerException in Jar.createIndexList()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: and web.xml

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 6. When updating an existing war file, if update=false and >>> needxmlfile=false, then things get complex. The problem here is >>> that there

Re: echo task documentation error

Dominique Devienne wrote: unless someone comes up with a good reason why this is a bug rather than a feature. It's a bug if it doesn't prefix that line with [echo] in non-emacs mode. is not much different from ${foo} with foo being empty. If foo is empty by mistake, how will one troubleshoot

Re: Where to submit patch to SQLExec.java

If I recall, there was a previous discussion about whether SQLExec should/shouldn't be refactored to deal with the myriad backend dbs that it must support. I don't think the discussion went anywhere in the end, but this task does have a lot of bug reps/enhancements filed against it Kev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39108] - FTP.java missing checks when file type is unknown

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39932] - lcp.bat prepends rather than appends

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36733] - NPE in XMLJUnitResultFormatter.formatOutput under Java 1.4.2_08

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40726] - java.lang.IllegalThreadStateException thrown when terminating several proccesses started via exec task.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27614] - Ant hangs when running build with junit.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r469312 - /ant/core/trunk/src/script/lcp.bat

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Oct 30 15:01:19 2006 New Revision: 469312 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=469312 Log: bugzilla 39932: lcp.bat prepended instead of append Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/script/lcp.bat Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/script/lcp.bat URL: http://svn.apac

Re: Where to submit patch to SQLExec.java

Hello Hunter, the usual procedure is to create a bug report under http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla and attach your patches to the bug report. It would be cool if someone in the ant community would review the bug reports concerning SQLExec. We committers are afraid of submitting some of these

svn commit: r469303 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/JUnitTestRunner.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Oct 30 14:29:35 2006 New Revision: 469303 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=469303 Log: Bugzilla 36733, NPE when failure in creating parser Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/JU

Where to submit patch to SQLExec.java

I have two main accomplishments in this patch: The first returns a row count in an efficient manner. The second is specific to mysql, it processes the mysql delimter command and is actually in its own file named MySQLExec.java How do I submit these?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39108] - FTP.java missing checks when file type is unknown

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache .NET Antlib 1.0 final

+0 Martijn On 10/29/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've created distribution files for the .NET Antlib and uploaded them to and propose to release them as 1.0 final. As described on the release plan for this Antlib I don't

[Ant Wiki] Update of "ExternalResources" by HughReid

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by HughReid: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/ExternalResources -- * [http://ww

Ant task to gpg sign artefacts

Hi, I have created in jakarta-sandbox, subproject openpgp an ant task to GPG sign artefacts. The openpgp library itself has been created by Brett Porter & Stefan Bodewig. There is no release of openpgp, but you can see the documentation online. I will probably have to go the extra step of crea

Re: svn commit: r468783 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html

modified closing tag. Are attributes allowed on closing tags ? No. --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache .NET Antlib 1.0 final

+0. --DD On 10/29/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've created distribution files for the .NET Antlib and uploaded them to and propose to release them as 1.0 final. As described on the release plan for this Antlib I don't exp

Re: echo task documentation error

unless someone comes up with a good reason why this is a bug rather than a feature. It's a bug if it doesn't prefix that line with [echo] in non-emacs mode. is not much different from ${foo} with foo being empty. If foo is empty by mistake, how will one troubleshoot this? Sure, not a very good

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache .NET Antlib 1.0 final

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > I've created distribution files for the .NET Antlib and uploaded them > to and propose to > release them as 1.0 final. > > +1 Antoine - To unsub

Re: and web.xml

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 4. You can then pull in a web.xml file via the webxml attribute, or via a nested fileset. In either case we say "Although needxmlfile is false, a web.xml file was included " ... and point to the file that was a

Re: people.apache.org/dist is missing files

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, while I copied the AntUnit files over I releazed that dist on people.apache.org must have been re-populated from an old backup, neither the .NET Antlib nor AntUnit were there. What's worse is that Ant 1.7.0 Beta 1 is the latest version available right now. Antoine, do

Re: A note on release votes

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - since we will be releasing both to the maven directory tree and using our usual distribution system, does the release manager also need to upload the java-repository directory tree, maybe as a zip fi

AW: echo task documentation error

>> I think you are a committer too. Feel free to edit the documentation. >> >>> >>> The ant manual states that the echo task's message attribute is >>> required "unless data is included in a character section within this >>> element." >>> >>> This appears to be false. I have by accident discove