DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] - fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] - fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] New: - fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36733] - NPE in XMLJUnitResultFormatter.formatOutput under Java 1.4.2_08

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: next release steps

Hello, Peter Reilly wrote: > > I have some pending work on classpaths in

svn commit: r468783 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html

Author: antoine Date: Sat Oct 28 16:17:29 2006 New Revision: 468783 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468783 Log: modified closing tag. Are attributes allowed on closing tags ? Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/asse

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40722] - logic changed for since ant 1.6.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r468781 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/AbstractFileSet.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/PatternSet.java src/tests/antunit/types/fileset-test.xml

Author: antoine Date: Sat Oct 28 15:54:48 2006 New Revision: 468781 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468781 Log: fix for Bugzilla 40722. Was identified as a directory scanning problem. Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/types/fileset-test.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/WH

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40722] - logic changed for since ant 1.6.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

Stefan Bodewig wrote: If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6 compatible branch. From this posting I got a reply from Paul King, who explained that similar asserts are being used in WebTest project and that he would be interested to learn the outcome of this discussion.

and web.xml

I've been updating the war file task with better support for optional web.xml files. Its been a bit tricky, but I've got a good set of unit tests. I so love antunit, BTW :) Here's the current setting 1 -Unless you say needxmlfile="false", the web.xml file is mandatory. This is compatible w

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide an open source testing framework for the enterprise. [...] The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are planning to open

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40722] - logic changed for since ant 1.6.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40313] - doesnt delete when defaultexcludes="false" and no includes is set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40313] - doesnt delete when defaultexcludes="false" and no includes is set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r468724 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/delete.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java src/tests/junit/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/DeleteTest.jav

Author: antoine Date: Sat Oct 28 12:07:22 2006 New Revision: 468724 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468724 Log: doesnt delete when defaultexcludes="false" and no includes is set fixed. Bugzilla 40313. Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/task

RE: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:14 AM > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > TestLogic is an ini

Re: A note on release votes

Hello Stefan, OK, maybe this does not comply with ASF procedures. I see that tomcat seems to be doing releases the same way as what you suggest and did for the antlib(s): http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=115859000312242&w=2 This procedure for releases opens for me a number of questio

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide > an open source testing framework for the enterprise. [...] > The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are > planning to open source when we rea

Re: A note on release votes

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefer the procedure which I have used for Ant 1.6 and for the > betas of 1.7 to define a release date in the vote thread, and then > to build and publish the release "mechanically" on the release date. I may have been a bit

Re: svn commit: r468260 - /ant/antlibs/common/trunk/build.xml

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >+ >> >+ >> >+ >> >> >> Stefan, >> why do you have chosen the name "-source" (leading '-') instead of >> "source"? To not confuse it with src and dest, maybe I

Re: Ideas on support of javax.script'ing

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idea is that ant-core code would first check for the language > implementation in bsf and if that (the language or bsf) does not > exist, ant-core will then check for javax.script support for the > language. Sounds good. Stefan

Re: [RE-VOTE] AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > I've re-built AntUnit with -source 1.2 and uploaded everything to > . I'd like to release > those files as 1.0Beta2. > > Stefan > +1 Conor - To un