Re: nodeps jar

Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds about (2)? Going once... -Matt - Original Message From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ant Developers List Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM Subject: nodeps jar I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this jar. Do the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37426] - task doesn't print all the Test names when using forkmode='once'

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40663] - junit: cannot see test class name unless fork=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40663] - junit: cannot see test class name unless fork=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40663] - junit: cannot see test class name unless fork=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40663] New: - junit: cannot see test class name unless fork=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29862] - Ant build does not work with log4j's %F option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29862] - Ant build does not work with log4j's %F option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r450606 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java

:) I am accustomed to other people not seeing things the way I do. The absence of the parentheses doesn't bother me, and satisfies my, again, pointless, desire to eliminate as many non-essential characters as possible. I have no problem putting these back if it makes everyone else happier th

Re: svn commit: r450606 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java

:) I am accustomed to other people not seeing things the way I do. The absence of the parentheses doesn't bother me, and satisfies my, again, pointless, desire to eliminate as many non-essential characters as possible. I have no problem putting these back if it makes everyone else happier tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40504] - Provide sort task like UNIX sort function

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40504] - Provide sort task like UNIX sort function

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r450606 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java

remove unnecessary parens -rc = (rc == null) ? new Resources() : rc; +rc = rc == null ? new Resources() : rc; Do you really think it reads better? I personally refuse operator precedence to rule my life ;-) --DD ---

Re: Mixins for Introspection

On 10/2/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >That would be *fantastic* Peter!!! It would be nice to have. I have no code but suspect that IH would hit new Complexity Limits. Are you refering to a particular code metric? or saying this in general? I personally think IH could be slimed

Re: Mixins for Introspection

On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> void antMixin(RegexMixin x) { >> this.regexParams = x; >> } > >That would be *fantastic* Peter!!! It would be nice to have. I have no code but suspect that IH would hit new Complexity Limits. >Overlap in attr/elem between the ma

Re: DynamicElement hack in ConditionBase

On 10/1/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/30/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/29/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I asked because AFAIK we still haven't come to a decision regarding my > > "look it up from the antlib" DynamicElement hack in Co

[Ant Wiki] Trivial Update of "ExternalResources" by Kevin Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Kevin Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/ExternalResources -- * ''IBM Rat

AW: svn commit: r451000 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ tests/junit/org/apache/tools/ant/

>> void antMixin(RegexMixin x) { >> this.regexParams = x; >> } > >That would be *fantastic* Peter!!! > >Overlap in attr/elem between the main type and the mixins >would be silently ignored (maybe a warning a warn or debug >level only), the main type taking precedence; but overlap in >attr/elem