RE: Resource.getURL() - example

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > My current impression is that, partially contingent on > Stephen's willingness to field questions, ;) the > protocol-based solution is preferable, or at least > worth _proving_ unsuitable. Matt: My schedule is free

Re: svn commit: r451000 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ tests/junit/org/apache/tools/ant/

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Make conditionbase a Task. > ?was there any reason that this was not done for ant 1.6? When I brought the whole condition eco-system into 1.4, I decided against extending Task because some of the conditions themselves extend ConditionBase as well.

svn commit: r451040 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk: ./ docs/ src/etc/testcases/ src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/ src/tests/junit/org/apache/ant/antunit/

Author: peterreilly Date: Thu Sep 28 15:12:58 2006 New Revision: 451040 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=451040 Log: add assertMatches assertion Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/contributors.xml ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/

Re: Resource.getURL() - example

--- Scott Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/28/06, Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > [...] > > This difference in scope an example that > demonstrates an area where existing > > protocols and software are insufficient. > > OK, if you say so. In my experience the statement

svn commit: r451000 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ tests/junit/org/apache/tools/ant/

Author: peterreilly Date: Thu Sep 28 13:03:55 2006 New Revision: 451000 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=451000 Log: Make conditionbase a Task. ?was there any reason that this was not done for ant 1.6? Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ConditionTas

Re: Resource.getURL() - example

On 9/28/06, Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] This difference in scope an example that demonstrates an area where existing protocols and software are insufficient. OK, if you say so. In my experience the statement "existing protocols and software are insufficient," is a red fla

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40595] - error when calling junittreport task (since tonight svn refresh)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40632] - spawned process through exec task blocks parent exec task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40632] - spawned process through exec task blocks parent exec task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40632] - spawned process through exec task blocks parent exec task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40632] New: - spawned process through exec task blocks parent exec task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Resource.getURL() - example

> -Original Message- > From: Scott Stirling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] > > > All of these protocols include support for the establishment of a > > > locally cached file that is a copy of the remote resource (partly > > > driven by the need to handle the relationship between mo

AW: AW: svn commit: r450609 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResourceInputStream.java

Sorry, I didnt know about your low-RAM-machine - I only see my strong glasses ... ;-) I think a readable code is more worth than a few bytes... so I am +1 for reverting. Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40504] - Provide sort task like UNIX sort function

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r450863 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/URLResource.java

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/URLResource.java?view=diff&rev=450863&r1=450862&r2=450863 == --- ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources

Re: AW: svn commit: r450609 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResourceInputStream.java

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] (RE removing parens from ternary ops) > What is the advantage apart from decreasing > readability? > Sorry, just my irrational resentment of unnecessary bytes... we can put them back if you like and I'll try to control myself. -Matt > Jan > > ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40595] - error when calling junittreport task (since tonight svn refresh)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r450863 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/URLResource.java

Author: antoine Date: Thu Sep 28 07:23:26 2006 New Revision: 450863 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450863 Log: running junitreport several times, issues with closing URLResource, bugzilla report 40595 Modified: ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/

AW: svn commit: r450609 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResourceInputStream.java

>Log: >add @since tag, remove unthrowable constructor exception, and >shrink some stuff > >Modified: > >ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResourceInputSt ream.java > >@@ -104,16 +104,12 @@ > if (managingPc != null) { > managingPc.log(message, loglevel)

Re: build failure.

1) which distro caused the error? 2) can the person who changed the source update that distro (so the build builds without error)? Thanks, Martin -- * This email message and any files transmitted with it contain confidential infor

Re: svn commit: r450679 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java

Doh! Thanks! -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: kevj > Date: Wed Sep 27 20:44:19 2006 > New Revision: 450679 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450679 > Log: > - fix broken build - change to > ConcatResourceInputStream wasn't completed here in > Concat > > Modified:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

On 9/28/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3 are to do with resource finding - I may need to roll back the > change I made to antclassloader in isolating resources .. - will > check. unless your changes to antclassloader

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40624] - Documentation misleading about use of ANT_HOME

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40623] - Default setting can crush ANT_HOME environment variable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40595] - error when calling junittreport task (since tonight svn refresh)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40595] - error when calling junittreport task (since tonight svn refresh)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40595] - error when calling junittreport task (since tonight svn refresh)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

where is the test report in html format

I think there should be some report about the test ,and I found the following in the Build.xml , but why I could not find the report generated by junit-report? Plz point out the mistake I have made. And what I want to do is to run ant test on another JVM (