AW: Building Ant 1.7beta

2006-08-28 Thread Jan.Materne
>> I've grumbled in the past that it is not very friendly for Ant trunk >> sources to be unbuildable by the current Ant release, but another >> committer (I forget now who) said this was intentional...? > >Might have been me. > >Sometimes we build new features that are useful enough to >apply th

Re: Future of the task

2006-08-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> We still support Ant 1.2, so we will certainly be supporting Ant >> 1.5 > > "Java 1.2" and "Java 1.5" I guess you meant. Err, yes. *blush* Stefan -

Re: [site] Separate svn directoy for WebSite?

2006-08-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > did you populate this site module using "svn copy" ? If you are talking about the site directory in svn, this really just holds a build.xml, a lib directory populated by hand, an empty directory and two svn:externals. I haven

Re: Building Ant 1.7beta

2006-08-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've grumbled in the past that it is not very friendly for Ant trunk > sources to be unbuildable by the current Ant release, but another > committer (I forget now who) said this was intentional...? Might have been me. Sometimes we bui

Re: AntVersion test failing

2006-08-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When the final version (1.7.0) is released, this code will work > fine, do you want to make it more robust for the beta release? I'd just accept that it doesn't like "beta" as a number and not worry too much, maybe even disable the tes

Re: AntVersion test failing

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Kev, at first glance it looks OK. Regards, Antoine Kev Jackson wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > As you requested, I've modified AntVersion to pass the failing test with > the beta, without using positional indexing (brittle) code - please see > commit for more details. Again if you spot a proble

Re: AntVersion test failing

2006-08-28 Thread Kev Jackson
Hi Antoine, As you requested, I've modified AntVersion to pass the failing test with the beta, without using positional indexing (brittle) code - please see commit for more details. Again if you spot a problem with this please let me know, I'll try to get it fixed asap. Thanks, Kev ---

svn commit: r437907 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/AntVersion.java

2006-08-28 Thread kevj
Author: kevj Date: Mon Aug 28 18:51:47 2006 New Revision: 437907 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437907&view=rev Log: as requested a refactoring that doesn't use indexOf - test passes with 1.7.0Beta1 Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/AntVersion.

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-08-28 Thread Jesse Glick
Peter Reilly wrote: The antlibs solution would be ok, but it does not solve ant optional tasks Perhaps we could arrange for tasks in the standard distribution not to be loaded until actually used. (This might be a performance win anyway.) Rather, the Ant core would create a new AntClassLoader

Re: Building Ant 1.7beta

2006-08-28 Thread Jesse Glick
Mark McKay wrote: Apparently, ant 1.7 can't be built with ant 1.6.5. No, it cannot. I've grumbled in the past that it is not very friendly for Ant trunk sources to be unbuildable by the current Ant release, but another committer (I forget now who) said this was intentional...? -J. -- [EMA

Re: Future of the task

2006-08-28 Thread Jesse Glick
Stefan Bodewig wrote: We still support Ant 1.2, so we will certainly be supporting Ant 1.5 "Java 1.2" and "Java 1.5" I guess you meant. Note that although JDK 6's javac does run annotation processors automatically (no need for a separate tool), it does *not* accept those written against the

svn commit: r437824 - /ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW

2006-08-28 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Aug 28 13:54:06 2006 New Revision: 437824 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437824&view=rev Log: move last comment to appropriate section. Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/WHATS

Re: svn commit: r437804 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Zip.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ZipTest.java

2006-08-28 Thread Matt Benson
Oops... didn't see the Beta1 in WHATSNEW. Sorry! -Matt --- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Matt, > > looks like nice work but ... > > please inaugurate the new section of WHATSNEW. > > Your change should be below : > > Changes from current Ant 1.7.0Beta1 version to >

Re: svn commit: r437804 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Zip.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ZipTest.java

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Matt, looks like nice work but ... please inaugurate the new section of WHATSNEW. Your change should be below : Changes from current Ant 1.7.0Beta1 version to current SVN version not below Changes from Ant 1.6.5 to Ant 1.7.0Beta1 :-) Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht -

svn commit: r437807 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Ant.java

2006-08-28 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Aug 28 12:59:41 2006 New Revision: 437807 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437807&view=rev Log: some ws Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Ant.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Ant.java URL: http:

svn commit: r437804 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Zip.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ZipTest.java

2006-08-28 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Aug 28 12:53:35 2006 New Revision: 437804 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437804&view=rev Log: included empty directories. Bugzilla report 40258. Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml ant/core/trunk/src/ma

svn commit: r437799 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ZipTest.java

2006-08-28 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Aug 28 12:39:08 2006 New Revision: 437799 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437799&view=rev Log: make whenempty-related tests antunit-esque in preparation for their new friend Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml ant/core/trunk/src/test

svn commit: r437786 - /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml

2006-08-28 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Aug 28 12:15:32 2006 New Revision: 437786 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437786&view=rev Log: ws Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/zip.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/cor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35776] - amend FileUtils to properly handle cygwin symbolic links

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r437589 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/AntVersion.java

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Kev, may be we can fill a String Buffer by hand with digits and dots until we find something else ? Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:02:42 +0700 Von: Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Ant Developers List" Betreff: Re: svn commit: r437589

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40209] - with huge build files, ant crashes with a RuntimeException: Mismatch - popped element = task:ant finished target element = target:update

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40311] - Ant doesn�t compile java.util.Collection

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35776] - amend FileUtils to properly handle cygwin symbolic links

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40311] - Ant doesn�t compile java.util.Collection

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_

Re: svn commit: r437589 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/AntVersion.java

2006-08-28 Thread Kev Jackson
On 28 Aug 2006, at 19:09, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I am not very fond of this versionString.indexOf("Ant version") +17); either. A regular expression looking for a string of digits and dots would be what we are looking for ? Unfortunately regexps aren't available in Java 1.2[1], do

Re: Ant 1.7.0Beta1 Released

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
On Aug 28, 2006, at 7:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please refer to our web site to find the download location. Hmm, I don't see any information there (probably because it still needs to get rsynced over which may take a fe

Re: svn commit: r437589 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/AntVersion.java

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I am not very fond of this versionString.indexOf("Ant version")+17); either. A regular expression looking for a string of digits and dots would be what we are looking for ? Antoine On Aug 28, 2006, at 10:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevj Date: Mon Aug 28 00:52:18 2006 New R

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40334] - Possible NPE in TarInputStream

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40334] New: - Possible NPE in TarInputStream

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40333] - need to use jsch-0.1.28

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40332] - need to use jsch-0.1.28

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40333] New: - need to use jsch-0.1.28

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2006-08-28 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dotnet-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2006-08-28 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dotnet-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40209] - with huge build files, ant crashes with a RuntimeException: Mismatch - popped element = task:ant finished target element = target:update

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40332] New: - need to use jsch-0.1.28

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: AntVersion test failing

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Kevin, On Aug 28, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Kev Jackson wrote: Hi all, AntVersion test is failing because the current Ant version number is 1.7.0Beta1 - the Beta1 characters are causing the DeweyDecimal code to fail. It's also extremely difficult to test in isolation as the version string is

Re: Ant 1.7.0Beta1 release

2006-08-28 Thread Kev Jackson
Hi Antoine (and others), I've just committed a change to AntVersion which now passes the tests on my machine if the value in the version.txt file is set to 1.7.0Beta1 (it still fails with the default value of @VERSION@). Can you see if you are still experiencing a problem with the full test suite

svn commit: r437589 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/AntVersion.java

2006-08-28 Thread kevj
Author: kevj Date: Mon Aug 28 00:52:18 2006 New Revision: 437589 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437589&view=rev Log: fixed AntVersionTest failures with Beta1 - this should fix the problem, let me know if it still breaks for you Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/t

Re: [site] Separate svn directoy for WebSite?

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Stefan, did you populate this site module using "svn copy" ? could you add to the site module (or I could do it myself) the manual of Ant 1.7.0Beta1 ? plus we need the links to this manual in index.html/index.xml. Regards, Antoine On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

Re: Ant 1.7.0Beta1 release

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Kev, the stack trace said something like "OBeta1, NumberFormatException". So setting the version to 1.7.0Beta1 specifically creates the problem. Regards, Antoine On Aug 28, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Kev Jackson wrote: I found 2 errors in the tests, one in AntVersion (a number format except

Re: AW: Building Ant 1.7beta

2006-08-28 Thread Mark McKay
Running build.bat alone was causing the error message I posted earlier. Not sure why it was filing, but I couldn't build with the .bat file. Mark McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bootstrap.bat should be run automatically from build.bat [1]: if exist bootstrap\lib\ant.jar ... MEANS "ALREA

AW: Building Ant 1.7beta

2006-08-28 Thread Jan.Materne
bootstrap.bat should be run automatically from build.bat [1]: if exist bootstrap\lib\ant.jar ... MEANS "ALREADY BOOTSTRAPPED" ... goto runAnt call bootstrap.bat Jan [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/build.bat >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Alexey Solofnenko [

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40184] - [PATCH] Move property expansion from Property and MacroInstance to the PropertyHelper class

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29347] - Recursive property expansion

2006-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu