Wolfgang Häfelinger is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 29-06-2006 and will not return until 24-07-2006. I will respond to your message when I return. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

On 27 Jun 2006, at 21:33, Conor MacNeill wrote: Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. The benefit will be to allow us to improve the Ant launch batch file as well as not having to test or support W

Re: tasks and Ant 1.7.0

Hi, My understanding is this. When Ant 1.7 is released, I think the idea is that the svn antlib will also be released on or around the same time. svn antlib will not be a 'core' task in the same way that cvs was/is, but it will be available and supported by the Ant team (as apache need th

tasks and Ant 1.7.0

Will the SVN tasks become core Ant tasks in Ant 1.7.0? http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/svn/index.html My company will probably be switching from CVS to Subversion in the future and I'd love to see the SVN tasks in Ant 1.7.0 Cheers, Sean -

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. +1 Martijn (drop OS/2 support along the way as well?) ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39926] - StarTeam tasks do not identify themselves as a particular application

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39926] New: - StarTeam tasks do not identify themselves as a particular application

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r417590 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. maintain CONTRIBUTORS as binary and remove contributors.xml. We > need to agree and maintain a file encoding - currently UTF-8 I think svn can do better than that, tell it the file is text/plain with UTF-8 encoding. Still ... >

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, > I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe,

svn commit: r417866 [3/3] - in /ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk: docs/ src/etc/testcases/http/ src/main/org/apache/ant/http/ src/war/WEB-INF/ src/war/resources/

Modified: ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/http/NullOutputStream.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/http/NullOutputStream.java?rev=417866&r1=417865&r2=417866&view=diff

Add WebTest in related projects

Hi, I think that WebTest is a great Open Source project that makes a really heavy use of ant (in fact I don't know other project that makes such an intensiv usage) and therefore should appear in the "Related Projects" page. According to the FAQ, I have to send a mail here to add the missing entry

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35817] - Javadoc: add failonwarning

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39671] - BuildListeners are not notified at the right time

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39924] New: - TarInputStream.read() never returns EOF

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35817] - Javadoc: add failonwarning

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ResourceUtils.selectOutOfDateSources: ant rebuilds class file again?

"Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have a look at the "always recompile" entry in the FAQ. --DD Yes, that explains the behaviour. Thanks, -- --Jhair - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35817] - Javadoc: add failonwarning

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ResourceUtils.selectOutOfDateSources: ant rebuilds class file again?

I can reproduce my problem also with a stable version of ant (1.6.4). So I suspect there is something terrible wrong in my build.xml file or I missed some important point in the documentation. That may be... Any other ideas what could be wrong? Have a look at the "always recompile" entry in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35817] - Javadoc: add failonwarning

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35817] - Javadoc: add failonwarning

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ResourceUtils.selectOutOfDateSources: ant rebuilds class file again?

Jeffrey E Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > AFAIK you would normally use SourceFileScanner to find source files > that are out of date relative to their destination files. SourceFileScanner is called indeed. Here is the backtrace after the breakpoint is hit: main[1] where [1] org.apache.tools

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35817] - Javadoc: add failonwarning

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

Now I know why I did not undertand how it worked... Maybe we should rename the current ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making incompatible changes in main ant.bat? - Alexey. On 6/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Conor MacNeill wrote: > ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifi

Re: ResourceUtils.selectOutOfDateSources: ant rebuilds class file again?

AFAIK you would normally use SourceFileScanner to find source files that are out of date relative to their destination files. Jeffrey E. (Jeff) Care [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM WebSphere Application Ser

ResourceUtils.selectOutOfDateSources: ant rebuilds class file again?

[My apologies if this question is more appropiate for the users list. I tested the following with sources from the SVN repository]. Please consider the test case below: http://people.freenet.de/jtocancipa/ant_test_case.tgz $ tar tvzf ant_test_case.tgz -rw-r--r-- user/users 257 2006-06-28 15:25:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39920] - hoax: Duplicated project name in import

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39920] New: - hoax: Duplicated project name in import

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: AW: AW: svn commit: r417590 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

>Or an XHTML page in UTF8; this stylesheet only handles latin names. Sure, I played a little bit A 2nd xsl produces xdoc, but not very well. doesnt keep the &#-encodings... I could update the build & src/etc for generating the plain file Jan --

AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

>Conor MacNeill wrote: >> ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern >platform, I'll >> refrain from passing judgement :-) >> > >leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely? I havent seen an OS/2 for a very long time... but I heard that my bank is using that. And maybe others,

Re: AW: AW: svn commit: r417590 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is with contributors.xml? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115142496218295&w=2 Good question and really the point of the email I sent yesterday. This is what I can determine CONTRIBUTORS needs to be binary because it contain

Re: AW: svn commit: r417590 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

Conor MacNeill wrote: Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is with contributors.xml? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115142496218295&w=2 Good question and really the point of the email I sent yesterday. This is what I can determine CONTRIBUTORS needs to be binary because it conta

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5019] - ejbjar does not package ejb-ref interfaces

Paul King wrote: Well, this bug isn't affecting me at the moment but calling EJB 2.x legacy before any of the vendors has released a production 3.x version seems a little eager. :-) JBoss is up to RC8 but even once offerings are out if will take time for users all to upgrade. point taken. A l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39901] - Log4j Configurator Task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: AW: svn commit: r417590 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> What is with contributors.xml? >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115142496218295&w=2 >> > > >Good question and really the point of the email I sent >yesterday. This is what I can determine > >CONTRIBUTORS needs to be binary because it contains non-ASCII >c

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

Conor MacNeill wrote: ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern platform, I'll refrain from passing judgement :-) leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: AW: svn commit: r417590 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp.java

Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What is with contributors.xml? > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115142496218295&w=2 > Good question and really the point of the email I sent yesterday. This is what I can determine CONTRIBUTORS needs to be binary because it contains non-ASCII characte

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe