DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37475] New: - ImportTask object puts artifical limit on where a file can be included

2005-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Ant Wiki] Update of "AntExternalTaskdefs" by MattBenson

2005-11-11 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by MattBenson: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntExternalTaskdefs The comment on the change is: document the Pack200 task -

Re: Pack200?

2005-11-11 Thread Greg Winton
I found this link... https://java-pack200-ant-task.dev.java.net/ I didn't look any further, but perhaps this is what you are looking for? Greg On 11/11/05, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lilianne E. Blaze wrote: > > Hello, > > I've noticed there are no Pack200 tasks? Why? > > bec

Re: Pack200?

2005-11-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Lilianne E. Blaze wrote: Hello, I've noticed there are no Pack200 tasks? Why? because there aren't Is anyone working on them at the moment? Or are they available externally? If they are, shouldn't they at least be mentioned in the manual? Because there is a limit to how we can keep

Re: [VOTE] Promote the .NET antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shall the .NET antlib be promoted? > > [X ] Yes (i.e. +1) > [ ] and I want to become a committer to it > [ ] No > -Matt __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.

Re: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the SVN Antlib out of the Sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shall the svn antlib be promoted? > > [ ] Yes (i.e. +1) > [ ] and I want to become a committer to it > [ ] No Abstaining due to the fact that alternatives (possibly even pure Java ones IIUC) exist. -Matt

Re: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the Antunit Antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shall the antunit antlib be promoted? > > [X ] Yes (i.e. +1) > [X ] and I want to become a committer to it > [ ] No > -Matt > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pack200?

2005-11-11 Thread Lilianne E. Blaze
Hello, I've noticed there are no Pack200 tasks? Why? Is anyone working on them at the moment? Or are they available externally? If they are, shouldn't they at least be mentioned in the manual? Greetings, Lilianne E. Blaze - T

Re: [VOTE] Promote the svn antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Peter Reilly
[ X] Yes [ X] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No Peter On 11/11/05, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Shall the SVN antlib be promoted? > > > > [ X] Yes (i.e. +1) > > [ ] and I want to become a committer to it > > [ ] No > > > I suppose I could become an committ

Re: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the Antunit Antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 , +1 (commiter please) Peter

Re: [VOTE] Promote the antunit antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Shall the Antunit antlib be promoted? [ X] Yes (i.e. +1) [X] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Promote the svn antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Shall the SVN antlib be promoted? [ X] Yes (i.e. +1) [ ] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No I suppose I could become an committer when I start bugfixes / changes on it. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Promote the .NET antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Shall the .NET antlib be promoted? [ ] Yes (i.e. +1) [ ] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No Blank vote from Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [VOTE] Promote the antunit antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib. Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7). Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC me

RE: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the SVN Antlib out of the Sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 November 2005 04:58 > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the SVN Antlib out of the Sandbox > > In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an > antlib needs a PMC

RE: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the Antunit Antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 November 2005 04:56 > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the Antunit Antlib out of the sandbox > > In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an > antlib needs a

RE: [VOTE] Promote the antunit antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 November 2005 20:06 > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Promote the antunit antlib out of the sandbox > > In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an > antlib needs a PMC ma

Re: [VOTE] Promote the .NET antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib. Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7). Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC me

Re: [VOTE] Promote the antunit antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Shall the Antunit antlib be promoted? [ X] Yes (i.e. +1) [X] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Promote the svn antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Shall the SVN antlib be promoted? [ X] Yes (i.e. +1) [ X] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No I'm not planning on changing the code, but reserve the right :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

svn commit: r332494 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW fetch.xml lib/libraries.properties

2005-11-11 Thread stevel
Author: stevel Date: Fri Nov 11 00:53:16 2005 New Revision: 332494 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332494&view=rev Log: update of library releases Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml ant/core/trunk/lib/libraries.properties Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSN

svn commit: r332493 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/repository/

2005-11-11 Thread stevel
Author: stevel Date: Fri Nov 11 00:49:12 2005 New Revision: 332493 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332493&view=rev Log: delete the libraries prototype Removed: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/repository/ --

svn commit: r332492 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: etc/testcases/taskdefs/ main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/repository/ testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/

2005-11-11 Thread stevel
Author: stevel Date: Fri Nov 11 00:44:54 2005 New Revision: 332492 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332492&view=rev Log: delete the libraries prototype Removed: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/libraries.xml ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/repository/