Re: Voting on sandbox libs

2005-11-09 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Stefan (and others), fine with me. Cheers, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: >Hi all, > >I've thought about the three-way votes needed here again and think it >is easiest to vote in two phases. First "promote or not" and if the >answer was "don't promote" then vote on "remove or keep in san

Re: PROPOSE: Property Trace Facility For Ant?

2005-11-09 Thread Craeg Strong
Dominique Devienne wrote: Changing an interface is a no-no of course. So far I think I like #1 best, i.e. adding a few overrides to the log methods in ProjectComponent to support an additional category. I'm not sure we'd need hierarchical categories a la Log4J or java.util.logging. Makes it

Re: Voting on sandbox libs

2005-11-09 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, I've thought about the three-way votes needed here again and think it is easiest to vote in two phases. First "promote or not" and if the answer was "don't promote" then vote on "remove or keep in sandbox". Does that work for you? Stefan ---

Re: PROPOSE: Property Trace Facility For Ant?

2005-11-09 Thread Dominique Devienne
On 11/9/05, Craeg Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! Continuing this thought experiment, what about enhancing > BuildListener like so: Changing an interface is a no-no of course. > The issue with these events is the same one you normally have with > exceptions. I can't comment on your ap

Re: PROPOSE: Property Trace Facility For Ant?

2005-11-09 Thread Craeg Strong
Dominique Devienne wrote: So obviously I'm +1 on adding such a facility, but implementing it the way you propose is indeed disruptive. Alternate impls (disclaimer: I'm just thinking aloud here...) might be: 1) Add categories to log messages. You could then change the log statements in property

Re: Voting on sandbox libs

2005-11-09 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've thought about the three-way votes needed here > again and think it > is easiest to vote in two phases. First "promote or > not" and if the > answer was "don't promote" then vote on "remove or > keep in sandbox". > > Does that work

Voting on sandbox libs

2005-11-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, I've thought about the three-way votes needed here again and think it is easiest to vote in two phases. First "promote or not" and if the answer was "don't promote" then vote on "remove or keep in sandbox". Does that work for you? Stefan

ANT cvs tag error

2005-11-09 Thread client
Hi, I am having a problem while executing the cvs tag operation in ant. Syntax is as below: cvsRoot="${env.CVSROOT}" package="testRepository" /> ERROR is as below: [cvs] Using cvs passfile: C:\Documents and Settings\Preetham\.cvspass [cvs] -f server: nothing know

svn commit: r332100 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/FilterSet.java

2005-11-09 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Wed Nov 9 10:39:35 2005 New Revision: 332100 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332100&view=rev Log: use FileUtils.close() Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/FilterSet.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Filte

svn commit: r332099 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/Os.java

2005-11-09 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Wed Nov 9 10:38:34 2005 New Revision: 332099 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332099&view=rev Log: ws Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/Os.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/Os.j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37426] - task doesn't print all the Test names when using forkmode='once'

2005-11-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37426] - task doesn't print all the Test names when using forkmode='once'

2005-11-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37426] New: - task doesn't print all the Test names when using forkmode='once'

2005-11-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: PROPOSE: Property Trace Facility For Ant?

2005-11-09 Thread Dominique Devienne
> Have you ever changed the value of a Property, re-run the build, but did > not get the result you wanted? Yep! > Did you wonder if the property setting got ignored (ignored override), > or if something else was wrong? Yep again! > I find myself in these situations when working on a large (sev

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

2005-11-09 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-11-09 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p