I will start votes on sandbox antlibs soonish

where soonish means this week. When we added the sandbox, the original proposal as well as the antlib charter contained a six months probation after which we should decide whether to turn the antlibs into non-sandbox antlibs, prolong probation (once) or drop them completely. All three current san

Re: AntUnit

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005, Dale Anson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a few things I'd like to see added to AntUnit: > > 1. better reporting, probably just need a more involved > AntUnitListener. Yes, this should be doable. The PlainListener really only is a first start so I could see the resu

Re: AntUnit

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current version of AntUnit probably has 80% or > better of the total test functionality. I think our > tests rely less and less on log messages and more on > results, etc. Log contents are probably the biggest > thing missing from

Re: adding new antlibs to the sandbox

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I add a new antlib to the sandbox? > > Every antlib appears to be its own SVN project, and I am suddenly > out of my depth in SVN use. OK, here is what I've done so far: (1) check in your antlib somewhere under sandbox/antl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37386] New: - checksum todir= attribute generates nullpointer exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XmlProperty

Awesome! Steve Loughran wrote: Dale Anson wrote: I'm not up on the code, but I like the concept, and I like the idea of retrofitting existing tasks to use a generic resource rather than methods for each specific type. My original question was about having the XmlProperty task read from a p

Re: AntUnit

As I mentioned in another thread, this approach to unit testing for Ant is much easier than junit testing. The concept is similar, but there is no need to write Java code for tests. The tests are in build files, several layers of indirection are avoided, and anyone who can write a build file

Re: XmlProperty

Dale Anson wrote: I'm not up on the code, but I like the concept, and I like the idea of retrofitting existing tasks to use a generic resource rather than methods for each specific type. My original question was about having the XmlProperty task read from a property as well as a file, I've alw

Re: XmlProperty

--- Dale Anson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not up on the code, but I like the concept, and > I like the idea of > retrofitting existing tasks to use a generic > resource rather than > methods for each specific type. My original > question was about having > the XmlProperty task read from

Re: XmlProperty

I'm not up on the code, but I like the concept, and I like the idea of retrofitting existing tasks to use a generic resource rather than methods for each specific type. My original question was about having the XmlProperty task read from a property as well as a file, I've always wanted similar

Re: XmlProperty

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Matt Benson > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> >

Re: AntUnit

--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >I'd not be opposed against making antunit part of > the core, but so far > >it hasn't attracted enough committers to even leave > the sandbox. And > >the six months probation time is over, BTW. FWIW, my feeling is that

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

adding new antlibs to the sandbox

How do I add a new antlib to the sandbox? Every antlib appears to be its own SVN project, and I am suddenly out of my depth in SVN use. -steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA

Re: AntUnit

Kev Jackson wrote: I think the using / maintaining by ourselves is more of a chicken and egg problem - We do not really need it for our "outside ant" activities - We cannot really use it for our "inside ant" activities as it is in the sandbox. - We do not maintain it as we do not use it, a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p